by Mistral AI · Mistral Medium family · best for cheap multilingual multimodal chat at volume
Mistral deprecated Mistral Medium 3.1 on 2026-05-22 with a retirement date of 2026-08-31 and names Mistral Medium 3.5 as its replacement; the model is gone from Mistral's API pricing page, the mistral-medium-3 alias now points to Medium 3.5, and as a closed-weight model it has no self-host path. Mistral Medium 3.1 (release 25.08, shipped 13 August 2025) was the cost-optimised workhorse of Mistral's proprietary "Premier" tier: a closed-weight, multimodal, 128K-context model priced at $0.40/$2.00 per 1M tokens — among the cheapest frontier-adjacent multimodal models on the market. It is an incremental refinement of Medium 3 (May 2025) with better instruction following, sharper tool use, and improved vision. The buyer's sentence: when budget was the dominant constraint and the workload chat/Q&A rather than agentic coding, this was the value pick until its retirement; Medium 3.5 is the replacement.
| Benchmark | Score | Source |
|---|---|---|
| HumanEval | 92% | artificialanalysis.ai 2026-05-28T00:00:00.000Z |
| LMArena Elo | 1409 | lmarena.ai 2026-09-13T00:00:00.000Z |
| GPQA Diamond | 57% | artificialanalysis.ai 2026-05-28T00:00:00.000Z |
| LMArena Coding Elo | 1454 | lmarena.ai 2026-09-13T00:00:00.000Z |
Six personas, six verdicts — the same panel that reviews every product on TopReviewed.
“The model I deployed from late 2025 until its August 2026 retirement — cheap, multilingual, multimodal, stable — before Medium 3.5 replaced it.”
Medium 3.1 has been the dependable production workhorse: inexpensive, multilingual, multimodal, and operationally reliable on La Plateforme. The strategic weakness is closed weights — no on-prem, so the sovereignty story is limited to EU-hosted API. Medium 3.5 offers open weights and a reasoning knob, and Mistral retired 3.1 on 2026-08-31 (deprecated 2026-05-22) with Medium 3.5 as the replacement, so the chat surface it served for mid-sized European SaaS has to move to Medium 3.5.
“It owns the 'cheap capable multimodal' slot in Europe, but its successor is already eating its strategic mindshare.”
Medium 3.1's positioning was sharp at launch: frontier-adjacent multimodal capability at a price that unlocked high-volume European-language use cases US flagships couldn't touch economically. That slot is still valuable, but the strategic narrative has moved to Medium 3.5 (open weights, merged architecture). 3.1 now reads as the mature, boring, cost-tier option rather than the headline. Against GPT-5 mini and Claude Haiku it competes on EU-language quality and price; against its own successor it competed only on cost. It held the slot as an incumbent until Mistral retired it on 2026-08-31.
“$0.40 in, $2.00 out made the high-volume bill a fraction of GPT-5 or Sonnet — until the 2026-08-31 retirement forced a move to Medium 3.5.”
Pricing was the entire story. $0.40/$2.00 makes Medium 3.1 a standout value among multimodal models with frontier-adjacent quality. For high-volume support tickets, summarisation, classification, and content variants, the monthly bill is a fraction of US flagships. The $0.04 cached-input rate and ~50% batch discount sharpen it further, and predictable throughput makes forecasts simple. There is no self-host lever (closed weights), so this is a pure API-economics play — but at this price, for the right workload, the unit economics were excellent. Mistral retired it on 2026-08-31, so budgets now have to absorb Medium 3.5's $1.50/$7.50.
“The most boring-in-a-good-way Mistral model I've shipped — clean API, predictable JSON, reliable vision parsing.”
After extended production use, Medium 3.1 is the dependable one: clean OpenAI-compatible API, predictable JSON tool use, reliable vision-input document parsing. No reasoning toggle, so for hard problems I route to Magistral or 3.5. Lower output throughput is occasionally annoying for streaming UX but fine for backend pipelines. It was the "good enough at minimum cost" default for builders who don't need agentic firepower, until its 2026-08-31 retirement. Docs are thinner than Anthropic's but adequate.
“Responsive and helpful for everyday questions; for routine help I can't tell it isn't a flagship — except the stream is a touch slower.”
In Le Chat at the Medium tier, Medium 3.1 is responsive and helpful for everyday questions, with excellent European-language quality. It feels slightly less polished than Large 3 or top US models on nuanced creative tasks, but for routine help the difference is hard to notice. Throughput is the main felt downside — replies stream a touch slower than competitors. Refusal rate is moderate and reasonable. A capable, unremarkable daily driver.
“Cheap and competent, but it's a closed model with thin published benchmarks and a successor that already beats it — buy it for price, nothing else.”
There is little to over-claim here, which makes the skeptic's job easy. Medium 3.1 is honestly positioned as a cost-tier model and delivers on that. The caveats: it is closed-weight, so the "EU sovereignty" halo around Mistral doesn't fully apply (no on-prem); Mistral published almost no numeric benchmarks, so the quality picture leans on third-party aggregation; and its own successor outperforms it on agentic/coding. None of this is deceptive — just a reminder that the value is price-per-token and not capability leadership. It was the pick where the bill dominated the decision, until the 2026-08-31 retirement.
These were its best uses until the 2026-08-31 retirement; Mistral Medium 3.5 is the replacement.
The full research notes behind this review — verified against primary sources.
Medium 3.1 is a dense transformer, but as a Premier/closed-weight model Mistral does not disclose parameter count, layer count, attention mechanism, or training scale — an honest contrast to the open Mistral models, where these are published. Context is 131K. Tokenizer is mistral_common. Architecture detail is deliberately undisclosed; we record what is verifiable (dense, 131K, multimodal) and null everything Mistral withholds rather than estimate.
Medium 3.1 is a generalist cost-tier model: strong general chat, solid coding (cap_coding 7.0), native vision input, and reliable JSON tool use (cap_function_calling 7.5). The 131K context covers most enterprise documents without paying for 256K (cap_long_context 7.0). Multilingual quality is excellent across European languages (cap_multilingual 8.5). It has no configurable reasoning (cap_reasoning 6.5, cap_math 6.0) — for extended thinking, callers route to Magistral or Medium 3.5. Throughput is on the slow side of its price tier (~45 tps), but the per-token economics more than compensate for batch and asynchronous workloads. No native real-time retrieval (cap_realtime_data 0.0).
| Benchmark | Score | vs Predecessor | vs Top Competitor | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Index | 21 (May 2026, before AA rescaled its index) | +~2 vs Medium 3 | above that date's price-tier median (~16) | Artificial Analysis |
| HumanEval | ~92% | +~1pp | parity with Llama 4 Maverick | Artificial Analysis |
| GPQA Diamond | ~57% | flat | trails reasoning models | Artificial Analysis |
Mistral published little numeric benchmark detail for Medium 3.1; the values above lean on Artificial Analysis aggregation. MMLU-Pro and standardized coding benchmarks are unpublished. Benchmark coverage is partial; confidence in the aggregate scores is medium-to-high but they are secondary-sourced.
Output throughput is roughly 45 tokens/sec — the slow side of the price tier, which can be felt in streaming chat UX but is a non-issue for backend pipelines and batch jobs. Time-to-first-token is not separately published (null). Medium latency tier overall; the model's appeal is economics, not speed.
| Surface | Cost | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| API input | $0.40 / 1M tok | La Plateforme price until retirement (2026-08-31) |
| API output | $2.00 / 1M tok | La Plateforme price until retirement |
| Cached input | $0.04 / 1M tok | cache read |
| Batch (in/out) | $0.20 / $1.00 | ~50% async discount |
| Direct UI | EUR 14.99/mo (~$15) | Le Chat Pro |
| Free tier | ~25 msg/day (Le Chat) | no card |
| Cloud | Bedrock, Azure AI Foundry, Vertex AI | managed |
Medium 3.1 is API-only and closed-weight — no self-host, no Hugging Face weights, in contrast to Medium 3.5's open release. Until its 2026-08-31 retirement it was available on La Plateforme (EU-hosted by default, US options) and managed on Amazon Bedrock, Azure AI Foundry, and Google Vertex AI. For buyers who need self-hosting or sovereignty-by-on-prem, this model does not deliver it; the EU-residency story here is limited to La Plateforme's EU hosting, not on-prem control.
Standard Mistral posture: GDPR-native, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001/27701, EU AI Act aligned, EU data residency by default, 30-day abuse retention, no training on inputs unless opt-in, Zero Data Retention available. No built-in moderation; separate Mistral Moderation API available. Moderate, consistent refusal calibration.
SDKs in Python and TypeScript/JavaScript; integrations with LangChain, LlamaIndex, and Vercel AI SDK. Powered Le Chat and Mistral AI Studio. As a mature, widely-deployed cost-tier model it reached mainstream popularity within Mistral's user base; its successor replaced it on 2026-08-31.
No — Medium 3.1 is Premier/closed-weight, API-only. For open weights at this tier, use Medium 3.5 (modified-MIT) or step down to Small 4 (Apache 2.0).
No reasoning toggle. Route hard analytical work to Magistral or Medium 3.5 with high reasoning effort.
You no longer can: Mistral deprecated Medium 3.1 on 2026-05-22 and retired it on 2026-08-31, naming Medium 3.5 as the replacement, and the mistral-medium-3 alias now points to Medium 3.5. Its case was pure cost: $2.00 output vs $7.50.
Yes on La Plateforme (EU default), with 30-day abuse retention, no training on inputs unless opt-in, ZDR available — but only as an API, not on-prem.
~45 tps — adequate for backend, a touch slow for snappy streaming chat.
Bedrock, Azure AI Foundry, and Vertex AI, plus La Plateforme until its 2026-08-31 retirement.
Its successor and Mistral's named replacement — open weights, reasoning knob, far stronger on agentic coding, but ~3.75x the output price ($7.50 vs $2.00).
Similar price tier, weaker EU-language quality, broader ecosystem and tooling.
Comparable cost tier; weaker multilingual and a different (Anthropic) safety/ecosystem trade.
Cheaper still, weaker European-language quality, Chinese-origin residency.
Primary references used to verify this review.
Does not train on API inputs by default
Last verified 2026-09-21