Zenity logo

Zenity Review

Visit

AI agent security and governance for the enterprise

Zenity is an AI agent security and governance platform for enterprises operating across SaaS, cloud, and endpoint environments.

Zenity·Founded 2021·Contact for pricingAI SecurityAI Agents & AssistantsAI Compliance

AI Panel Score

7.1/10

6 AI reviews

Reviewed

AI Editor Approved

About Zenity

In practice, Zenity connects to an organization's SaaS platforms, cloud environments, and endpoints to build an inventory of AI agents, copilots, and automations already in use, including ones created outside formal IT channels. Security and risk teams use this inventory to assess posture, identify misconfigurations or excessive permissions, and monitor agent behavior for signs of misuse or compromise. When threats are detected, the platform supports inline prevention to block or contain risky agent actions in real time rather than only alerting after the fact.

The platform is organized around named use cases tied to specific systems where agentic AI is deployed, including Microsoft Copilot Studio, Microsoft Foundry, Salesforce and Salesforce Agentforce, ServiceNow, and ChatGPT Enterprise, as well as broader risk categories such as MCP (Model Context Protocol) implementations. Zenity also maintains a research arm, Zenity Labs, which has published findings on agent vulnerabilities (such as the AgentFlayer research) and collaborates with frameworks like MITRE ATLAS on classifying AI agent attack techniques. The company describes a concept of "guardian agents" as part of its approach to agentic AI governance.

Features

AI

  • Guardian Agents

    Establishes a framework of guardian AI agents designed to monitor and protect other AI agents within an organization.

Core

  • AI Agent Discovery

    Discovers AI agents, copilots, and automations across an organization's SaaS, cloud, and endpoint environments.

  • Full Lifecycle Coverage (Buildtime to Runtime)

    Secures AI agents across their entire lifecycle, from development/buildtime through live runtime operation.

Integration

  • ChatGPT Enterprise Security

    Delivers security oversight and governance for organizations using ChatGPT Enterprise.

  • Microsoft Copilot Studio Integration

    Provides dedicated security and governance coverage for AI agents built and deployed in Microsoft Copilot Studio.

  • Salesforce Agentforce Security

    Secures AI agents deployed within Salesforce Agentforce environments.

  • ServiceNow Integration

    Integrates with ServiceNow to secure AI and automation workflows running on the platform, including SecOps use cases.

Security

  • AIDR (AI Detection and Response)

    Provides AI-driven incident detection and response capabilities for identifying and reacting to threats against AI agents.

  • Inline Prevention

    Applies inline controls to block risky or malicious AI agent actions before they execute.

  • MCP Risk Coverage

    Addresses security risks associated with Managed Cloud Platforms (MCP) used in agentic AI deployments.

  • Posture Management

    Assesses and manages the security posture of discovered AI agents and automations across the enterprise.

  • Threat Detection

    Monitors AI agent activity to detect real-time threats and malicious behavior.

Preview

Zenity desktop previewZenity mobile preview

Pricing Plans

Contact Sales

Contact sales

Zenity is an enterprise AI agent security and governance platform sold via a sales-led model; no public list pricing is available and organizations must contact Zenity directly for a custom quote based on scale and needs.

  • Unified observability and inventory of AI agents, copilots, and chatbots across environments
  • Buildtime governance and guardrails to prevent over-permissioned or risky agent configurations
  • Runtime threat detection and response for prompt injection, data leakage, and agent logic abuse
  • Coverage across SaaS platforms like Microsoft 365 Copilot and ChatGPT Enterprise, plus custom-built agents

AI Panel Reviews

The Decision Maker

The Decision Maker

Strategic bet, vendor viability, timing, adoption approval
7.4/10

Real problem, real research, a $125M round behind it — and pricing still hidden in a sales call.

“Zenity covers a gap most CISOs don't know they have yet, and a $125M Series C says the market agrees. Sales-led pricing with no public number is still the harder half of the board conversation.”

Copilot Studio, Salesforce Agentforce, ServiceNow, ChatGPT Enterprise. That's the right list of integrations today. Every enterprise has shadow agents already; the question is whether anyone's watching them.

Zenity Labs publishing AgentFlayer research and working with MITRE ATLAS is the kind of signal that matters more than a feature list. It says the team understands attacks, not just dashboards. Compare that to CrowdStrike or Microsoft's own Defender bolting on agent visibility as a checkbox — Zenity's built for this specific problem.

Two things worry me. No public pricing means every deal is a negotiation, and three published case studies — Varonis and Telit Cinterion among them — is a short list to hand a board asking who else runs this at scale. Pilot it against one high-risk surface — Copilot Studio or ChatGPT Enterprise — before any enterprise-wide commitment.

Competitive Positioning7.5

Few dedicated players cover Copilot Studio and Agentforce natively; adopting early is a differentiator versus peers still relying on generic DLP tools.

Reputation Risk6.8

Being early on agent security looks smart if it works, sketchy if the vendor can't produce reference customers on request.

Speed to Value6.5

Discovery of shadow agents (per the platform's core capability) can show value in weeks, but inline prevention rollout across ServiceNow, Salesforce, and Microsoft stacks is a longer integration lift.

Strategic Fit7.8

Full buildtime-to-runtime lifecycle coverage addresses a genuinely new risk category, not just cheaper monitoring of known threats.

Vendor Viability8.0

A $125M Series C led by Norwest in August 2026 and 230-plus staff answer the three-year question; the open risk is the category, not the balance sheet.

Pros

  • Named integrations for Copilot Studio, Agentforce, ServiceNow, ChatGPT Enterprise cover the highest-risk surfaces first
  • Zenity Labs research (AgentFlayer, MITRE ATLAS collaboration) signals genuine security depth, not marketing
  • Full lifecycle model (buildtime to runtime) instead of alert-only monitoring

Cons

  • No public pricing tier or free trial makes early evaluation slower
  • Only three published case studies, so scale references are thin
  • Sales-led model means procurement cycle before any pilot starts

Right for

Enterprises already running Copilot Studio, Agentforce, or ChatGPT Enterprise at scale and worried about shadow agents.

Avoid if

Skip if your agent footprint is still small or experimental and a generic CASB covers your current risk.

The Domain Strategist

The Domain Strategist

Craft and strategy in the product's domain — adapts identity per category, same lens
8.3/10

Shadow AI agents are my new shadow IT problem, and Zenity is built for exactly that gap.

“Zenity attacks the unmanaged-agent inventory problem that no CASB or CSPM tool was designed to catch. It's an emerging-category bet, not a mature one, but the lifecycle coverage and named integrations are the right architecture.”

Unmanaged AI agents are today's version of shadow SaaS, except these things can take autonomous action with production credentials. Zenity's discovery-first model, mapping agents across Microsoft Copilot Studio, Salesforce Agentforce, ServiceNow, and ChatGPT Enterprise, is the correct starting posture. I can't govern what I can't inventory, and agent sprawl outside formal IT channels is precisely where my next incident originates.

Intent-based detection examining tool calls, memory access, and control flow, rather than prompt-string filtering, tells me their research arm (Zenity Labs, AgentFlayer) is doing real adversarial work, not marketing. MITRE ATLAS and OWASP mapping gives my audit team a defensible framework.

The tradeoff: no public pricing, sales-led motion, and zero free trial means a long procurement cycle before I can validate inline prevention against my actual agent fleet. Competing against CrowdStrike and Microsoft's native Purview extensions for budget won't be trivial, but the buildtime-to-runtime scope is more complete than either.

Category Positioning8.4

Sits ahead of generic CASB/CSPM tools by treating agents as a first-class asset class, competing directly with CrowdStrike's emerging AI-SPM push.

Domain Fit8.5

Discovery-plus-posture-plus-runtime lifecycle mirrors how CISOs actually triage unmanaged shadow-IT-style risk.

Integration Surface8.4

SaaS, cloud and endpoint coverage claimed, and docs.zenity.io publishes the per-integration setup — Azure, Salesforce, ServiceNow, Bedrock — openly enough to validate before a purchase.

Long-term Implications7.6

Named integrations (Copilot Studio, Agentforce, ServiceNow) create dependency on Zenity tracking each vendor's agent framework changes.

Strategic Depth8.3

Intent-based detection across tool calls, memory, and control flow goes beyond prompt-firewall approaches most competitors ship.

Pros

  • Full buildtime-to-runtime lifecycle coverage with named platform integrations (Copilot Studio, Agentforce, ServiceNow, ChatGPT Enterprise)
  • Intent-based detection examining execution path, not just prompt text
  • Active research arm (Zenity Labs) publishing real vulnerability findings like AgentFlayer
  • MITRE ATLAS and OWASP mapping supports audit and compliance narratives

Cons

  • No public pricing, no free trial, meaning a sales-led evaluation cycle before technical validation
  • Category is nascent; three-year durability of vendor-specific integrations is unproven
  • Depth lives in vendor-specific connectors, so coverage tracks Microsoft's and Salesforce's release pace, not Zenity's

Right for

Enterprises with active Microsoft Copilot Studio, Salesforce Agentforce, or ServiceNow agent deployments needing lifecycle-wide governance now.

Avoid if

Avoid if your organization has minimal agentic AI footprint or needs self-serve pricing and a fast proof-of-concept without a sales cycle.

The Finance Lead

The Finance Lead

Money, total cost of ownership, contracts, procurement math
5.4/10

Zero dollars on the page. Zero tiers. Zero comparison math possible.

“No published pricing means no TCO model, just a sales call. Enterprise security budgets deserve better than 'contact us.'”

No pricing page. No tiers. No starting price. Just 'contact sales.' That's category norm for enterprise security — Wiz and CrowdStrike play the same game — but it doesn't help finance.

Can't build a 3-year TCO without a number to start from. Guardian Agents, AIDR, MCP risk coverage — real features, zero list price attached. Budget owners get quoted per-seat or per-agent, likely scaled to org size. No way to model seat creep or renewal risk sight unseen.

No free trial, no free plan. Procurement has to run a full sales cycle before seeing a contract. That's fine for a $500K ARR enterprise deal. It's friction for anyone hoping to benchmark against Microsoft Purview or CrowdStrike's agent security add-ons before committing budget.

Billing & Procurement4.5

Sales-led onboarding only, no self-serve path, no invoicing detail available.

Contract Flexibility4.5

No public terms on renewal, term length, or exit — standard enterprise opacity, category norm.

Pricing Transparency2.0

No pricing page, no tiers, no starting price — fully sales-gated.

ROI Clarity6.0

Intent-based detection and inline prevention offer measurable stops (blocked actions), but no benchmark metrics published.

Total Cost of Ownership4.0

Feature set (buildtime-to-runtime, four named integrations) suggests real deployment cost but no number to model against.

Pros

  • Buildtime guardrails catch over-permissioned agents before they turn into incident-response spend
  • Named integrations for Copilot Studio, Agentforce, ServiceNow, ChatGPT Enterprise
  • Intent-based detection mapped to MITRE ATLAS and OWASP

Cons

  • No published pricing or tiers
  • No free trial to test before procurement cycle
  • TCO impossible to model without a quote

Right for

Enterprises with existing security budget and a procurement team ready for a sales-led evaluation.

Avoid if

You need a number today to compare against CrowdStrike or Microsoft before your board meeting.

The Domain Practitioner

The Domain Practitioner

Daily hands-on reality in the product's domain — adapts identity per category, same lens
7.6/10

Shadow-agent discovery is real, but you're triaging alerts sight-unseen until sales calls you back

“Zenity's pitch — inventory every Copilot Studio flow and Agentforce bot before someone else finds it first — hits a real gap. Docs are open, but no pricing page and no free trial means you're evaluating this on paper until procurement is already in motion.”

Intent-based detection tracking tool calls, memory access, and control flow instead of just prompt content is the right instinct — prompt firewalls alone miss agent logic abuse, and Zenity's own materials call that out directly against a real failure mode. Guardian agents watching other agents is a defensible model for runtime containment, closer to how CrowdStrike frames EDR than how CASB tools frame SaaS visibility.

Day-3 reality is better than the marketing site suggests. docs.zenity.io is open — per-integration setup for Azure, Salesforce, ServiceNow and Bedrock, a Boundaries CLI, release notes. What I couldn't find is a full API reference, and policy-as-code examples would carry more weight than connector checklists.

No free trial, no public pricing, sales-led only. Fine for a security budget line item, bad for a hands-on eval where you'd normally spin up a sandbox and poke at the MCP risk coverage yourself before committing headcount to onboarding it.

Day-3 Reality7.8

Strong detection concept, and docs.zenity.io publishes per-platform setup plus release notes, though real usage patterns still need a live tenant.

Documentation Practitioner-Fit7.8

docs.zenity.io is open and engineer-shaped — SSO setup, service-principal and connected-app guides, a Boundaries CLI, release notes.

Friction Surface6.5

No self-serve trial or pricing page adds procurement friction before any technical friction is even reachable.

Power-User Depth7.8

MITRE ATLAS mapping and Zenity Labs research (AgentFlayer) signal depth beyond checkbox compliance.

Workflow Integration8.0

Named integrations for Copilot Studio, Agentforce, ServiceNow, ChatGPT Enterprise map directly onto where agents actually live.

Pros

  • Intent-based detection tracks tool calls and control flow, not just prompt text
  • Dedicated coverage for Copilot Studio, Agentforce, ServiceNow, ChatGPT Enterprise
  • Zenity Labs research and MITRE ATLAS mapping show real threat research behind the product

Cons

  • Setup docs are solid, but I couldn't find a full API reference or policy-as-code examples
  • No free trial or public pricing forces a sales cycle before any hands-on test
  • MCP risk coverage described broadly without concrete policy examples

Right for

Enterprise security teams already running Copilot Studio or Agentforce at scale who need shadow-agent discovery now.

Avoid if

Avoid if you need a self-serve trial or public docs before looping in procurement.

The Power User

The Power User

Daily human experience, onboarding, polish, learning curve, reliability
6.8/10

Serious security tool for a problem most companies don't know they have yet.

“Zenity watches the AI agents your employees spun up without telling IT. Whether that's a daily win or a quarterly report depends entirely on who's using it.”

No pricing page, no free trial, straight to 'contact sales.' That's normal for enterprise security, but it means I can't tell you what day one feels like — nobody outside a sales call has. What I can tell from the site is the feature list is real, not vaporware: Copilot Studio, Salesforce Agentforce, ServiceNow, ChatGPT Enterprise, all named integrations, plus intent-based detection that traces tool calls and memory access instead of just scanning prompts like a firewall would.

This isn't a tool you open at 9am. It's a tool your SOC team lives inside of, or ignores until an incident happens. That's the whole category though — compare it to how Wiz approaches cloud posture, alert fatigue is the real enemy, not the UI.

The guardian agents concept and Zenity Labs research (AgentFlayer) suggest real technical depth. Whether day-to-day dashboards feel like homework, nobody outside a pilot knows yet.

Daily Polish6.5

Release notes are published, but I couldn't find product screenshots, so daily UI quality stays unverifiable either way.

Learning Curve6.5

Named use cases per platform (Copilot Studio, Agentforce, ServiceNow) help focus onboarding but the surface area is genuinely large.

Mobile Parity3.0

It's a web console as far as I can tell; this is a SOC category so mobile isn't really the point, but there's nothing for a phone.

Onboarding Experience5.5

Sales-led with no free trial means onboarding is a negotiated deployment, not a self-serve first hour.

Reliability Feel7.5

Inline prevention and runtime detection mapped to OWASP/MITRE ATLAS suggest a mature detection pipeline, not just alerts.

Pros

  • Discovery sweeps SaaS, cloud, and endpoints to inventory copilots and automations already running
  • Intent-based detection goes beyond prompt-level firewalls
  • Full lifecycle coverage from buildtime through runtime
  • Inline prevention can block a risky agent action, not just log it

Cons

  • No pricing transparency, no free trial, sales-led only
  • Docs are open, but with no trial you still can't touch the product before a sales call
  • Web console only — nothing to check on a phone when an alert fires at 2am

Right for

Enterprise security teams already juggling Copilot Studio, Agentforce, or ServiceNow agents built outside IT's knowledge.

Avoid if

You want to try before you buy or you're a smaller org without a dedicated SOC team.

The Skeptic

The Skeptic

Contrarian. Watch-outs, deal-breakers, broken promises, category patterns
6.9/10

No public pricing, sales-led, and 'Guardian Agents' branding on a category still forming.

“Zenity's coverage list reads well — Copilot Studio, Agentforce, ServiceNow, ChatGPT Enterprise. But pricing isn't public anywhere, and 'Guardian Agents' is the kind of framing that needs a lot more proof than a landing page gives.”

'Guardian agents' as a category name. I've heard variations of this from CASB vendors circa 2015 and CSPM vendors circa 2019 — 'we'll watch the thing watching your stuff' is a durable pitch, not always a durable company. Netskope and Wiz both survived similar framing. Plenty of others didn't.

What's real here: named integrations (Copilot Studio, Agentforce, ServiceNow, ChatGPT Enterprise), a research arm publishing actual findings (AgentFlayer), and MITRE ATLAS alignment. That's more grounding than most AI-security decks show. Docs are open at docs.zenity.io, release notes and all, so shipping cadence is checkable from outside.

Contact-sales-only pricing at this stage is category norm, not a red flag by itself. Exit portability is the real question: agent governance data and policies built up over 18 months don't travel light if you switch vendors. Competitive field is thin but filling fast — CrowdStrike and Palo Alto both circling this space.

Competitive Differentiation7.5

Multi-platform breadth (Copilot Studio, Agentforce, ServiceNow, ChatGPT Enterprise) is wider than most single-platform AI security tools today.

Exit Portability5.5

Docs are open at docs.zenity.io, but I couldn't find an export path; posture and policy data built up over time likely doesn't travel.

Long-term Viability7.8

A $125M Series C in August 2026, 230-plus staff, and active Zenity Labs research answer the runway question; the category question stays open.

Marketing Honesty7.0

Claims are specific (named platforms, MITRE ATLAS mapping) rather than pure superlative, but 'guardian agents' framing is aspirational.

Track Record Match6.5

Fits the CASB/CSPM discovery-then-control playbook that has both winners and graveyard entries.

Pros

  • Broad named-platform coverage across Microsoft, Salesforce, ServiceNow, OpenAI
  • Published original research (AgentFlayer) lending some technical credibility
  • Full lifecycle claim (buildtime to runtime) is more complete than point solutions

Cons

  • No public pricing at any tier — you can't scope a budget without a sales call
  • Exit story is thin — I couldn't find an export path for policies and posture history
  • 'Guardian agents' branding is more narrative than proven mechanism

Right for

Enterprises already running Copilot Studio, Agentforce, or ChatGPT Enterprise at scale who need agent inventory now.

Avoid if

You need transparent self-serve pricing or want to evaluate without a sales cycle.

Buyer Questions

Common questions answered by our AI research team

Integration

Which platforms does Zenity integrate with?

Zenity offers dedicated integrations for Microsoft Copilot Studio, Salesforce Agentforce, ServiceNow, and ChatGPT Enterprise, covering AI agents and copilots across SaaS, cloud, and endpoint environments.

Integration

Does Zenity support Microsoft Copilot Studio?

Yes, Zenity has a dedicated integration for Microsoft Copilot Studio as part of its coverage across leading agent-building platforms.

Security

How does Zenity detect malicious agent behavior?

Zenity uses intent-based detection, examining the full execution path including tool calls, memory access, data usage, and control flow to identify malicious or unintended outcomes even when inputs look harmless. This approach exposes attacks that prompt-based firewalls miss and correlates configuration, permissions, and runtime behavior into actionable threat signals.

Features

Does Zenity cover agents at runtime or only buildtime?

Zenity covers the full agent lifecycle from buildtime to runtime, combining preemptive risk prevention during configuration with runtime threat detection, investigation, and response mapped to OWASP and MITRE ATLAS.

Features

Can Zenity monitor agents across SaaS and endpoint devices?

Yes, Zenity provides unified visibility, policy control, and threat prevention across SaaS, home-grown agentic platforms (Cloud), and end-user devices (Endpoint).

Alternatives to Zenity

Who Zenity competes with, and how each one differs

HiddenLayer logo
HiddenLayer6.9/10

The closest pure-play AI security peer: both discover AI assets and add runtime protection. HiddenLayer centres on the model layer — model scanning, AI supply-chain security and adversarial-ML attack simulation — while Zenity works at the agent and copilot application layer inside Microsoft, Salesforce, OpenAI and AWS platforms, governing what deployed agents are allowed to do.

N
Noma Security

The most direct head-to-head rival: another Israeli-founded AI agent security platform selling AI security posture management plus runtime guardrails to enterprise CISOs, and it raised $100M in July 2025 to chase the same buyers. Noma leans more toward the AI/ML development pipeline and self-built agents; Zenity leans toward agents built on packaged SaaS platforms such as Copilot Studio and Agentforce.

Palo Alto Networks logo
Palo Alto Networks8.2/10

Attacks the same problem as a platform incumbent through Prisma AIRS, which added agentic AI protection in 3.0, backed by the Protect AI and Portkey acquisitions. It bundles AI security into an enterprise-wide network and cloud security contract, whereas Zenity sells as a standalone AI-agent-specific product that can be bought without displacing an existing security stack.

CrowdStrike logo
CrowdStrike8.3/10

Entered enterprise AI security by acquiring Pangea for $260M in September 2025, extending Falcon into AI detection and response for employee and agent use of GenAI. CrowdStrike leads with endpoint and identity telemetry and an existing agent on the box; Zenity is agentless and derives its signal from the SaaS and low-code platforms where business agents are actually built.

SentinelOne logo
SentinelOne8.1/10

Bought Prompt Security in August 2025 for roughly $250M to add GenAI and copilot security to its XDR platform, overlapping Zenity on prompt-injection defence and shadow-AI discovery. SentinelOne's route to market is the existing endpoint and SIEM footprint; Zenity competes on depth of coverage for agent build-time posture and per-agent policy rather than breadth of platform.

Also in AI Security