Casetext CoCounsel logo

Casetext CoCounsel Review

Visit

AI legal research and drafting assistant for practicing attorneys

Casetext CoCounsel is an AI-powered legal assistant built on GPT-4 for attorneys.

Thomson Reuters·Founded 2008·Contact for pricingFree TrialAI LegalAI Agents & AssistantsAI Writing & Content

AI Panel Score

8.0/10

6 AI reviews

Reviewed

About Casetext CoCounsel

Casetext CoCounsel is an AI legal assistant developed by Casetext, a legal technology company, and built on OpenAI's GPT-4 model. It is designed for practicing attorneys and law firms who need to perform research, review documents, and prepare legal materials more efficiently. The tool is trained and configured for legal contexts, distinguishing it from general-purpose AI writing tools.

CoCounsel supports a range of legal tasks including case law research, contract analysis, deposition preparation, legal memo drafting, and document review. Attorneys can input queries or upload documents and receive structured, cited responses that are intended to reflect the standards of professional legal work. The system is designed to surface relevant statutes, case law, and contractual clauses in a format attorneys can act on.

The product is positioned within the legal technology market alongside other AI-assisted research platforms. Casetext had an existing legal research platform before launching CoCounsel, and the assistant integrates with that research infrastructure. In 2023, Casetext was acquired by Thomson Reuters, which has influenced the product's distribution and development roadmap.

CoCounsel is intended primarily for attorneys at law firms, in-house legal departments, and other legal professionals. It is a web-based tool, and access is provided through a subscription model. Pricing has been geared toward professional and firm-level use, reflecting its enterprise focus rather than a consumer audience.

Features

AI

  • Contract Analysis

    Identifies key issues, risks, and relevant provisions across uploaded contracts; compares terms and flags deviations.

  • Deep Research (Agentic AI)

    Hands off full legal research questions to an autonomous AI agent that reasons, plans, sources answers, and builds argument foundations.

  • Deposition Question Generation

    Generates deposition question lists tailored to a case theory and uploaded evidence.

  • Document Summarization

    Summarizes long legal documents and depositions into concise briefs with citations to source passages.

  • Pleading & Correspondence Drafting

    Drafts pleadings, motions, and legal correspondence from natural-language instructions.

  • Trial Strategy Preparation

    Helps prepare trial strategies by analyzing case materials and surfacing argument framings.

Automation

  • Guided Workflows

    Pre-built workflows for drafting privacy policies, employee policies, complaints, and discovery requests/responses.

Core

  • Case Timeline Preparation

    Builds chronological case timelines from uploaded discovery materials and depositions.

  • Deposition Transcript Review

    Reviews deposition transcripts to surface inconsistencies, key admissions, and follow-up question candidates.

  • Document Review & Search

    Searches and reviews uploaded documents; extracts specific provisions across large transactional contract sets.

Integration

  • Practical Law Integration

    Connects CoCounsel to Practical Law content for guided workflow templates and best-practice resources.

  • Westlaw Integration

    Grounds research and analysis in Thomson Reuters Westlaw content for verifiable legal citations.

Preview

Casetext CoCounsel desktop previewCasetext CoCounsel mobile preview

Pricing Plans

Contact Sales

Contact sales

CoCounsel is a professional-grade AI platform for legal, tax, audit, and accounting professionals. No public pricing is listed; prospective customers must contact Thomson Reuters for a quote.

  • AI-powered legal research, tax calculations, compliance reviews, and contract drafting
  • Integration with Westlaw, Practical Law, Checkpoint, and Microsoft 365
  • Access to leading LLMs (OpenAI GPT, Google Gemini) backed by authoritative Thomson Reuters content
  • Data privacy with zero-retention API calls and AES-256 encryption
  • Custom data retention policies managed at the organization account level
  • Built by 1,000+ AI and ML experts with guardrails to limit bias and inaccuracies

AI Panel Reviews

The Decision Maker

The Decision Maker

Strategic bet, vendor viability, timing, adoption approval
8.5/10

A board-proof legal AI bet from Thomson Reuters, gated only by quote-only pricing.

CoCounsel is owned by Thomson Reuters and crossed one million users across 107 countries in February 2026. The catch is no public price, so procurement walks in blind.

One million users in 107 countries, announced February 2026. Thomson Reuters paid $650 million for Casetext back in 2023. No board asks whether this vendor survives three years.

The real call is whether CoCounsel advances your firm or just speeds up research associates already do. Deep Research hands a full question to an autonomous agent that plans, sources, and builds argument foundations grounded in Westlaw content. Harvey competes hard on legal-tuned models, but the differentiator here is the Thomson Reuters corpus the citations verify against, not the chat box.

However, the buying process is the friction. Pricing is contact-sales only, scaled to seat count and content packages, so you cannot model cost before a demo. Reputation risk is near zero with a public-company vendor. Pilot it with one practice group for 90 days, confirm the citation accuracy, then negotiate the firm-wide seat math.

Competitive Positioning8.0

About a quarter of Fortune 1000 companies use it, signaling peers are already in.

Reputation Risk8.8

A public-company vendor with one million users is an easy choice to defend to the board.

Speed to Value7.8

Guided workflows shorten routine drafting, but firm rollout still needs a 90-day pilot.

Strategic Fit8.2

Deep Research and Westlaw grounding advance legal work rather than just trimming cost.

Vendor Viability9.2

Owned by publicly traded Thomson Reuters, which paid $650 million for Casetext in 2023.

Pros

  • Backed by Thomson Reuters, a public company with no realistic three-year survival risk.
  • Deep Research grounds answers in Westlaw and Practical Law content with verifiable citations.
  • One million users across 107 countries shows broad, defensible industry adoption.
  • Zero-retention API calls and AES-256 encryption ease security and data-governance review.

Cons

  • Contact-sales pricing with no public tiers makes cost modeling impossible before a demo.
  • Enterprise positioning prices out solo practitioners and very small firms.

Right for

Law firms who want verifiable AI research backed by a durable vendor.

Avoid if

Solo practitioners who need transparent per-seat pricing upfront.

The Domain Strategist

The Domain Strategist

Craft and strategy in the product's domain — adapts identity per category, same lens
8.2/10

CoCounsel's moat is Thomson Reuters content, but adopting it means committing to that corpus.

CoCounsel grounds agentic legal AI in Westlaw and Practical Law, a corpus rivals cannot replicate. The craft ceiling is high, but the value is inseparable from Thomson Reuters' content and quote-only pricing.

A general counsel choosing a legal-AI substrate for the next three years should weigh what the answers are grounded in, not the chat surface. CoCounsel's bet is content: Thomson Reuters bought Casetext for $650M in 2023 and rewired the assistant onto Westlaw and Practical Law. That grounding is the architecture.

The craft ceiling is real. Deep Research hands a full research question to an autonomous agent that plans and sources every answer against Westlaw citations, while Contract Analysis flags clause deviations across large transactional sets. Against Harvey, which fine-tunes its own models, CoCounsel's edge is verifiable authority rather than model novelty.

The catch is the lock-in. The value lives in Thomson Reuters content, so leaving means leaving the corpus, not just the tool, and pricing is quote-only with no public tiers. With one million users reached in February 2026, this is a durable bet on the incumbent rather than the frontier.

Category Positioning8.3

One million users by February 2026 makes it the incumbent platform in legal AI.

Domain Fit8.4

Contract Analysis, deposition review, and pleading drafting map directly to how litigators and transactional attorneys work.

Integration Surface8.0

Integrates with Westlaw, Practical Law, Checkpoint, and Microsoft 365 across the legal stack.

Long-term Implications7.6

Adoption ties the firm to Thomson Reuters' content corpus, a durable but deepening dependency.

Strategic Depth8.5

Westlaw and Practical Law grounding plus Deep Research agentic reasoning is best-in-class craft for legal AI.

Pros

  • Answers are grounded in Westlaw and Practical Law content that newer entrants cannot replicate.
  • Deep Research delivers autonomous, sourced legal research with human oversight built in.
  • Covers research, contract review, deposition prep, and drafting in one platform.
  • Integrates with Checkpoint and Microsoft 365 alongside core Thomson Reuters research tools.

Cons

  • No public pricing tiers; every adoption runs through Thomson Reuters enterprise sales.
  • Strategic value is inseparable from the Thomson Reuters corpus, deepening vendor lock-in.

Right for

Law firms who need AI research grounded in verifiable Westlaw citations.

Avoid if

Solo practitioners who want self-serve evaluation and public pricing.

The Finance Lead

The Finance Lead

Money, total cost of ownership, contracts, procurement math
7.7/10

No published price, contact-sales only, and a quote that scales with seat count and content packages.

CoCounsel lists nothing — every number comes from a Thomson Reuters sales call. The quote stacks Westlaw and Practical Law content fees on top of seats.

No sticker on the page. CoCounsel sells through Thomson Reuters as an enterprise quote, priced on firm size, seat count, and content packages. Procurement starts blind. Casetext sold to Thomson Reuters in August 2023 for $650M, so the vendor is durable, not a startup risk.

The catch is the content stack. The AI seat is one line; Westlaw Integration and Practical Law access are separate licenses you likely already carry or must add. A 30-attorney firm bundling Westlaw plus CoCounsel can clear six figures a year before training time. Harvey prices the same opaque way, so blind quotes are a category norm here, not a Thomson Reuters quirk.

ROI is legible. Deep Research and contract review produce auditable billable-hour savings, and one million users as of February 2026 signals a stable roadmap. Negotiate term length and audit content-package overages.

Billing & Procurement8.0

Thomson Reuters is an established vendor with low onboarding risk after the $650M Casetext acquisition.

Contract Flexibility7.5

Enterprise terms leave negotiation room on seats and term length, though no public cancellation policy.

Pricing Transparency6.0

No published tiers — pricing page lists only Contact Sales, so every buyer starts blind.

ROI Clarity8.5

Deep Research and contract review map directly to auditable billable-hour savings attorneys can measure.

Total Cost of Ownership7.0

Seat cost stacks on Westlaw and Practical Law content licenses, pushing firm-level spend into six figures.

Pros

  • Backed by Thomson Reuters, a durable vendor with low procurement and continuity risk.
  • Westlaw-grounded answers cite authoritative sources, making research-hour savings auditable.
  • One million users by February 2026 signals a stable, well-funded product roadmap.
  • Deep Research and contract review tie directly to measurable billable-hour ROI.

Cons

  • No published pricing — every quote requires a Thomson Reuters sales call.
  • AI seats stack on separate Westlaw and Practical Law content licenses, inflating all-in cost.
  • No free plan and enterprise-only positioning shuts out small and solo practices.

Right for

Law firms who already license Westlaw and want grounded legal AI.

Avoid if

Solo practitioners who need transparent published per-seat pricing.

The Domain Practitioner

The Domain Practitioner

Daily hands-on reality in the product's domain — adapts identity per category, same lens
8.0/10

CoCounsel grounds research in Westlaw and cites every clause, but pricing stays behind a sales call.

Deep Research and Contract Analysis cut the routine grind out of a litigation associate's week. But there is no public pricing and no free plan, so scoping it solo is off the table.

An associate measures legal AI by the week a discovery deadline closes in, not the partner demo. CoCounsel's Deep Research hands a research question to an agent that plans, sources, and returns answers grounded in Westlaw and Practical Law. Every holding traces back to a cited authority instead of a confident paragraph you re-verify against good law.

The daily win is Contract Analysis across a document set. Upload a transactional batch, ask it to flag deviations, and it works the whole set at once instead of one PDF per prompt. Lexis+ AI covers similar ground, but CoCounsel's Guided Workflows feel built around how a matter moves from intake to filing.

No public pricing and no free plan, though. Access runs through a Thomson Reuters sales quote keyed to firm size. A solo practitioner can't scope a pilot. With one million users announced February 2026, this is built for firms.

Day-3 Reality8.0

Cited, Westlaw-grounded answers hold up under the verification pressure of a real filing week.

Documentation Practitioner-Fit8.0

Has docs and a blog; answers cite source passages so practitioners can verify rather than trust.

Friction Surface7.5

Batch document handling reduces re-prompting, though no-trial access adds friction before onboarding.

Power-User Depth8.2

Deep Research agents and twelve task types scale from quick lookups to full trial-strategy prep.

Workflow Integration8.0

Guided Workflows and document-set Contract Analysis map onto how matters move from intake to filing.

Pros

  • Deep Research answers trace back to cited Westlaw and Practical Law authority, not open-web text.
  • Contract Analysis works across an entire uploaded document set in one pass.
  • Guided Workflows cover real recurring tasks like discovery requests and complaint drafting.
  • Case Timeline Preparation builds chronologies straight from deposition transcripts.

Cons

  • No public pricing and no free plan make a solo pilot impossible to scope.
  • Access runs through Thomson Reuters enterprise sales keyed to firm size.
  • Web-only, with no mention of a native desktop or mobile workflow.

Right for

Litigation and transactional attorneys at firms who run research and contract review weekly.

Avoid if

Solo practitioners who need transparent pricing before committing.

The Power User

The Power User

Daily human experience, onboarding, polish, learning curve, reliability
8.0/10

CoCounsel earns its keep on cited research, but you cannot see a price without a call

The Westlaw grounding means answers come back with sources you can actually check. The catch is no public pricing and no free tier, so the first ten minutes are a sales form.

A million professionals across 107 countries were using CoCounsel by February 2026, so this is no demo-glow gamble — it is a tool people actually keep open. What you feel day three is that the answers come back cited. Ask it something and it points at Westlaw and Practical Law passages, not open-web guesses you then have to babysit.

Deep Research is the part that earns its keep. Hand it a full legal question and the agentic flow plans, sources, and builds an argument foundation while you stay in the loop. Contract Analysis does the same trick across a stack of uploaded agreements, flagging deviations instead of leaving you to scroll. It feels built by people who know the work runs late.

Harvey is the obvious standalone rival. But CoCounsel hides its price behind a Contact Sales form, and since the 2023 Thomson Reuters acquisition it is firmly enterprise-shaped, so you cannot size your real cost without a rep on the line.

Daily Polish8.0

Cited answers and structured outputs show a team that sweated the verification details lawyers care about.

Learning Curve8.0

Guided Workflows and pre-built flows give attorneys a clear path from first hour to month three.

Mobile Parity7.5

Web-only enterprise legal tool where mobile is not the core use case, scored neutral.

Onboarding Experience6.5

No free tier and a Contact Sales gate mean the first ten minutes are a quote request, not the product.

Reliability Feel8.5

Westlaw and Practical Law grounding plus zero-retention API calls and AES-256 encryption signal a solid, trustworthy base.

Pros

  • Answers are grounded in Westlaw and Practical Law, so every cite can be verified.
  • Deep Research hands off full legal questions to an agentic flow that plans and sources.
  • One million users across 107 countries by February 2026 removes the empty-state guesswork.
  • Guided Workflows give a clear starting point instead of a blank chat box.

Cons

  • No public pricing and no free tier — every evaluation starts with a sales form.
  • Firmly enterprise-shaped since the Thomson Reuters acquisition, not built for solo buyers.

Right for

Attorneys who need cited, verifiable research instead of open-web guesses

Avoid if

Solo practitioners who want to see a price before talking to sales

The Skeptic

The Skeptic

Contrarian. Watch-outs, deal-breakers, broken promises, category patterns
7.7/10

A Thomson Reuters product with a real corpus behind it, but the version under you keeps changing.

Casetext was acquired for $650M and the tool now reaches a million users. The catch is contact-only pricing and a product that was relaunched and renamed since launch.

The vendor-survival question is mostly answered. Casetext got acquired by Thomson Reuters for $650M in 2023, and the company announced one million CoCounsel users in February 2026. A 173-year-old public parent is not the legal-AI graveyard pattern. The startups racing it are.

What I would watch is product churn, not company churn. CoCounsel launched on GPT-4 in March 2023, then was relaunched as CoCounsel Legal in August 2025 with Westlaw-grounded agentic AI. That is a fast rewrite for a tool firms build billing workflows around. The features are concrete — Deep Research hands full questions to an autonomous agent, and Westlaw Integration grounds answers in verifiable citations. Harvey leans on model tuning instead; the corpus here is the moat.

The yellow flag is opacity. Contact-only pricing, no public tiers, no free plan. You cannot benchmark cost before you commit.

Competitive Differentiation7.8

Westlaw and Practical Law grounding is a content moat Harvey and Lexis cannot easily copy.

Exit Portability6.8

Documents export, but Deep Research workflows and Westlaw-grounded analysis do not port to a rival.

Long-term Viability8.2

Thomson Reuters backing, a million users, and steady relaunches signal a durable three-year bet.

Marketing Honesty7.5

Claims like one million users and Westlaw grounding are specific and verifiable, not vague aspiration.

Track Record Match8.0

A profitable public parent and a real legal corpus match survivor patterns, not the startup graveyard.

Pros

  • Thomson Reuters ownership removes most of the vendor-shutdown risk a young legal-AI tool carries.
  • Westlaw and Practical Law grounding gives answers verifiable citations instead of open-web guesses.
  • Deep Research and contract analysis are concrete named workflows, not roadmap vapor.
  • One million users across 107 countries is real adoption evidence, not a launch projection.

Cons

  • Contact-only pricing with no public tiers means no cost benchmark before signing.
  • The product was relaunched and renamed within two years, fast churn for billable workflows.
  • Exit portability is thin once research workflows depend on Westlaw grounding.

Right for

Law firms who already pay for Westlaw and want grounded legal AI.

Avoid if

Solo practitioners who need transparent pricing before committing.

Buyer Questions

Common questions answered by our AI research team

Features

What is Deep Research in CoCounsel?

Deep Research is an agentic AI capability that hands off full legal research questions to an autonomous agent. It reasons, plans, and delivers comprehensive results grounded in Westlaw and Practical Law content, sourcing each answer and building argument foundations with human oversight.

Features

Can CoCounsel help with contract review at scale?

Yes. Upload a set of contracts and ask CoCounsel to compare terms, flag deviations, or extract specific provisions. It is built for transactional practices handling contract review across large document sets.

Features

What guided workflows are available?

Guided workflows currently include drafting privacy policies, employee policies, complaints, discovery requests and responses, and deposition transcript reviews.

Security

Where does CoCounsel get its legal information?

CoCounsel is grounded in Thomson Reuters Westlaw and Practical Law content. Answers cite the underlying sources, which means the legal analysis can be verified against authoritative material rather than open-web data.

Pricing

How much does CoCounsel cost?

CoCounsel is sold as an enterprise legal AI product through Thomson Reuters with no public pricing tiers — pricing depends on firm size, seat count, and content packages. Contact Thomson Reuters sales for a quote.

Integration

How is CoCounsel related to Casetext?

Casetext built the original CoCounsel on top of OpenAI's GPT-4 in 2023. Thomson Reuters acquired Casetext in August 2023 for $650M. The current product, CoCounsel Legal, was relaunched in August 2025 with Westlaw-grounded agentic AI capabilities.

support

Who is CoCounsel built for?

Practicing attorneys and legal professionals at law firms and corporate legal departments. Use cases extend beyond core legal research to tax law, regulatory compliance, due diligence, and contract review.

Features

How big is the user base?

Thomson Reuters announced one million CoCounsel users in February 2026, indicating broad adoption across the legal industry.

Product Information

  • Founded

    2008
  • Pricing

    Contact for pricing
  • Free Trial

    Available

Platforms

web

About Thomson Reuters

Thomson Reuters is a Toronto-based information and technology company providing Westlaw, Practical Law, Checkpoint, and AI-powered tools for legal, tax, and news professionals.

Resources

Documentation
Blog

Also in AI Legal