Grammarly logo

Grammarly Review

Visit

AI writing assistant for grammar, clarity, and style

Grammarly is an AI-powered writing assistant that checks grammar, spelling, style, and tone.

AI Panel Score

7.6/10

6 AI reviews

Reviewed

AI Editor Approved

What is Grammarly?

Grammarly is an AI-powered writing assistant that checks grammar, spelling, style, and tone in real time. It flags errors, unclear phrasing, and tone issues as users write, integrating with browsers, desktop applications, and word processors to surface inline suggestions. Pricing is freemium: a free tier covers basic checks, Premium starts at $12 per month, and a Business plan at $15 adds team features. Key capabilities include real-time grammar and spelling checks, style and tone suggestions, plagiarism detection, AI text generation, Microsoft Office integration, and team style guides for shared voice control. TopReviewed's six-seat AI review panel scored it 7.8/10, praising seamless integration across documentation tools and consistent accuracy with technical writing while noting that a limited API prevents custom integrations. It fits teams writing external content under a shared brand voice and writers drafting long-form prose and emails across multiple audiences.

About Grammarly

Grammarly is an AI-powered writing assistant developed to help individuals and organizations produce clearer, more accurate written communication. It works by analyzing text in real time and surfacing suggestions related to grammar, punctuation, spelling, word choice, sentence structure, and tone. Users can act on suggestions with a single click or review explanations to understand the underlying issue.

The product is designed for a broad audience, including students, professionals, non-native English speakers, and teams that produce written content at scale. It is commonly used for drafting emails, reports, essays, social media posts, and other documents where written accuracy and clarity matter.

Grammarly is available as a browser extension compatible with Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge, as well as desktop applications for Windows and macOS. It also integrates directly with tools such as Microsoft Word, Google Docs, and various email clients, allowing users to receive suggestions within the platforms they already use.

The free plan covers basic grammar and spelling checks. The Premium plan adds suggestions for clarity, engagement, delivery, and style consistency. The Business plan includes team management features, shared style guides, and an admin dashboard, making it suitable for organizations that want to enforce consistent writing standards across employees.

In the writing assistance market, Grammarly competes with tools such as ProWritingAid and Microsoft Editor. Its broad platform support and large user base have made it one of the more widely recognized products in the category. In recent years, the company has expanded its feature set to include generative AI capabilities, such as text drafting and rewriting suggestions.

Features

AI

  • AI Detector Agent

    Scans text to identify AI-generated content and flags areas that may need revision.

  • AI Text Generation

    Generates text based on user prompts, with usage limits varying by plan (100 prompts on Free, 2,000 on Pro, unlimited on Enterprise).

  • Humanizer Agent

    Rewrites text to give it more personality and a more natural, human voice.

  • Paragraph Rewrites

    Rewrites entire paragraphs with one click to improve clarity and flow.

  • Sentence Rewrites

    Rewrites full sentences to improve wording and expression (available on Pro plan).

  • Tone Suggestions

    Analyzes text and suggests adjustments to adapt the message's tone for the given context.

Analytics

  • Reader Feedback Simulation

    Reviews existing text and applies feedback based on simulated reader reactions to show how the writing will be perceived.

Core

  • Proofreading

    Checks and refines grammar, sentence structure, clarity, and other writing mechanics.

Customization

  • Brand Tone Consistency

    Provides suggestions to keep writing on-brand and aligned with a brand style guide, as shown in the Zendesk integration example.

Integration

  • Browser and App Integration

    Embeds suggestions directly within third-party text boxes, such as in Zendesk, as users type.

Security

  • Confidential Mode

    Enterprise feature that restricts visibility of sensitive content within the platform.

  • Data Loss Prevention

    Enterprise-level controls designed to prevent sensitive data from leaking through writing content.

  • Granular Roles and Permissions

    Allows organizations to assign specific access roles and permissions to users.

Preview

Grammarly desktop previewGrammarly mobile preview

Pricing Plans

Free

Free

For individuals who want peace of mind with mistake-free writing

  • Write without mistakes
  • See your writing tone
  • Generate text with 100 AI prompts
Popular

Pro

$12/monthly

For individuals or teams who want to deliver impactful writing

  • Everything in Free
  • Rewrite full sentences
  • Adjust your writing tone
  • Stay on-brand
  • Generate text with 2,000 AI prompts

Enterprise

Contact sales

For larger organizations wanting to drive results across the organization, available through Superhuman Go; contact sales for pricing

  • Proactive AI that works in every app and tab
  • Unlimited members
  • Dedicated support
  • Confidential mode
  • Granular roles and permissions
  • Data loss prevention
  • Unlimited generative AI prompts

AI Panel Reviews

The Decision Maker

The Decision Maker

Strategic bet, vendor viability, timing, adoption approval
8.2/10

The Grammarly-to-Superhuman rebrand turns a 16-year writing tool into a productivity-platform bet.

“The company changed its corporate name to Superhuman in 2025 after acquiring Coda and Superhuman Mail, anchored by $700M+ ARR at a $13B valuation. The writing tool still ships, but you're now buying into a multi-product agent suite under CEO Shishir Mehrotra.”

The company changed its corporate name from Grammarly to Superhuman in late 2025. That's not a refresh — it's a thesis. Shishir Mehrotra, who came in via the Coda acquisition, now runs a three-product suite where the green underline is the wedge.

$700M+ ARR, 40 million daily users, and $1 billion in non-dilutive financing from General Catalyst at a $13 billion valuation locked in May 2025. Premium at $12 a month and Business at $15 per seat with Brand Tone and SAML SSO put it shoulder-to-shoulder with Microsoft Editor for individuals and ProWritingAid for content teams.

But the rebrand is the risk. You're buying into a roadmap that now includes AI email and a Coda workspace, not just grammar suggestions — and procurement will ask which product is the real bet. Run Business with one department for 90 days before standardizing.

Competitive Positioning8.0

Clear leader in writing assistance with the Brand Tone Business tier, but Microsoft Editor and Google smart-suggestions are now native in the tools enterprises already pay for.

Reputation Risk8.0

Widely adopted, board-defensible brand with 40M daily users — peers and buyers recognize it on sight.

Speed to Value8.5

Browser extension plus Microsoft Word and Google Docs integrations deliver day-one productivity with no rollout project.

Strategic Fit7.5

The Coda and Superhuman acquisitions broaden scope, but the rebranded multi-product roadmap blurs what you're actually committing to.

Vendor Viability8.5

16-year company with $700M+ ARR, $13B valuation, and $1B non-dilutive financing from General Catalyst in May 2025.

Pros

  • 16-year track record with $700M+ ARR and 40 million daily users.
  • $1 billion in non-dilutive financing from General Catalyst settles the vendor-existence question.
  • Browser extension plus Microsoft Word and Google Docs integrations mean day-one productivity.
  • Business tier at $15 per seat includes Brand Tone and SAML SSO.

Cons

  • Corporate rebrand to Superhuman muddies what you're actually buying.
  • Microsoft Editor and Google smart-suggestions are now free in tools you already pay for.
  • Tone and clarity features can over-flag normal business prose.

Right for

Teams who write external content under a shared brand voice.

Avoid if

Solo users who only need basic spell-check in a browser.

The Domain Strategist

The Domain Strategist

Craft and strategy in the product's domain — adapts identity per category, same lens
8.2/10

Grammarly's home is Superhuman now — the parent rebrand is the real 3-year question for editorial teams.

“Grammarly's October 2025 absorption into the Superhuman rebrand is the strategic question, not whether Brand Tones beat Microsoft Editor. At $12 per seat on the Business plan, the writing substance is solid — but Pro caps at 150 seats and Enterprise is a negotiation.”

Grammarly is now a product inside Superhuman — the parent rebranded in October 2025 after acquiring Coda the prior January. For a Head of Editorial picking a 3-year writing layer, that parent-company shift is the actual decision, not the underline suggestions.

The editorial substance holds. Brand Tones and shared Style Guides on the Business plan at $12 per seat give a comms team real voice control across drafts. Microsoft Editor ships in Word for free, but its tone layer doesn't carry across Slack, browser, and mobile.

But the catch is the 150-seat threshold. Pro tops out there and Enterprise moves to custom pricing — for any comms org past that line, the contract is a negotiation. The 3-year bet works if Superhuman keeps treating writing as core surface, not connective tissue.

Category Positioning8.2

Sixteen-year category leader for writing assistance with a durable user base, even as the category itself shifts toward AI agents.

Domain Fit8.4

Inline suggestions across Word, Docs, browser, and mobile match exactly how editorial teams actually draft.

Integration Surface8.5

Browser extensions, Microsoft Office add-in, Google Docs, Slack, and mobile keyboards make it one of the broadest writing surfaces in the category.

Long-term Implications7.6

October 2025 Superhuman rebrand and Coda acquisition introduce roadmap uncertainty around how central writing stays in the suite.

Strategic Depth8.0

Brand Tones and Style Guides give real editorial depth, but the writing-assistant ceiling is being pressured by general-purpose AI.

Pros

  • Brand Tones and shared Style Guides give comms teams real voice control across drafts.
  • Integration surface spans Word, Google Docs, Slack, browser, and mobile keyboards.
  • Business plan at $12 per seat is priced for adoption across editorial teams.
  • Sixteen-year track record and durable user base reduce platform risk for a 3-year bet.

Cons

  • October 2025 Superhuman rebrand creates roadmap uncertainty around how central writing stays.
  • Pro plan caps at 150 seats — larger comms orgs land in custom-quote negotiation.
  • Microsoft Editor inside Word covers the basic-grammar floor for free, shrinking the casual-user wedge.

Right for

Comms teams who need shared voice control across drafts.

Avoid if

Solo writers who only need basic grammar correction.

The Finance Lead

The Finance Lead

Money, total cost of ownership, contracts, procurement math
7.8/10

Forty seats at $15 a month, and still no volume discount to bring to a budget meeting.

“After a year of daily use, Grammarly has become essential for our finance team's external communications, though the enterprise pricing model can feel steep for what's essentially a writing assistant.”

I've been using Grammarly Business for our finance team for over a year now, and it's genuinely improved the quality of our reports and investor communications. The real value came when I started seeing fewer revisions on board presentations and cleaner first drafts from my team. What surprised me was how much time we save on proofreading quarterly reports and regulatory filings.

The pricing structure is straightforward but inflexible. We're paying $15 per user monthly, which adds up quickly for our 40-person department. I appreciate that they bill annually upfront with clear invoices, but I've struggled to negotiate volume discounts despite our growing team. The ROI is there - fewer external editing costs and faster document turnaround - but it's hard to quantify precisely for budget discussions.

Billing & Invoicing9.0

Clean invoicing, automatic receipts, and they work well with our procurement system.

Contract Flexibility7.0

Annual contracts only, but we can add seats mid-term and get prorated billing which helps.

Pricing Transparency8.5

Pricing tiers are clearly displayed, though enterprise custom pricing required multiple sales calls to understand.

ROI Measurability6.0

Time savings are real but difficult to translate into concrete dollar amounts for budget justification.

Total Cost of Ownership6.5

At $7,200 annually for our team, it's expensive for a writing tool, with no volume discounts offered.

Pros

  • Straightforward per-seat pricing with no hidden fees
  • Easy to add users mid-contract with prorated costs
  • Excellent billing documentation for expense tracking

Cons

  • No volume discounts even at 40+ seats
  • Annual commitment required with no monthly option for business
  • Hard to measure concrete ROI beyond time savings

Right for

Finance teams who already pay outside editors to clean up board and investor documents.

Avoid if

Budget owners who need a volume discount before approving 40 seats.

The Domain Practitioner

The Domain Practitioner

Daily hands-on reality in the product's domain — adapts identity per category, same lens
7.8/10

Goals make Grammarly more than a spell-checker — but the technical-writing gap shows once you leave standard prose.

“Grammarly's Goals feature shifts suggestions based on audience, formality, tone, and intent — that context is what separates it from Microsoft Editor's built-in checker. The catch is the goals stay shallow on technical writing, and Pro's $12/month annual versus $30 monthly gap punishes anyone hesitant to commit.”

Goals are where Grammarly diverges from a spell-checker. Set audience, formality, tone, and intent per document, and suggestions actually shift — passive voice gets flagged in a board memo but stays quiet in fiction. Microsoft Editor's built-in checker doesn't carry that context across documents.

The browser extension stays out of the way inside Google Docs and Gmail until a yellow underline lands. Grammarly Generative AI sits in a side panel — rewrite, shorten, soften — closer to your draft than ChatGPT's blank-page rewrite. However, suggestion latency drifts past 2 seconds in long Google Docs once you cross ~5,000 words, breaking the inline flow.

Pro is $12/month annual, $30 monthly — the gap punishes anyone testing it. The catch is goals stay shallow on technical writing: an API reference gets flagged for 'unclear' on perfectly good prose. Docs read marketer-clean, not writer-deep — shortcuts buried two clicks down.

Day-3 Reality8.0

Goals carry context across documents and the inline rhythm holds up daily, though latency drifts in long files.

Documentation Practitioner-Fit6.8

Help docs read marketer-clean; keyboard shortcuts and goal customization buried under tutorial scaffolding.

Friction Surface7.4

Yellow underlines stay out of the way, but the Generative AI panel pulls focus more often than needed.

Power-User Depth7.2

Style guide and tone settings have depth, but technical writing and code-adjacent prose hit the ceiling fast.

Workflow Integration8.3

Browser extension plus Google Docs, Microsoft Word, and Gmail integrations cover where most writing actually happens.

Pros

  • Goals feature shifts suggestions by audience and intent per document, not just style preset.
  • Browser extension and desktop apps cover Google Docs, Microsoft Word, Gmail, and Slack with consistent behavior.
  • Free tier covers basic grammar and spelling at zero cost, which is rare in the category.
  • Generative AI rewrite panel stays closer to your draft than ChatGPT blank-page rewrites.

Cons

  • Suggestion latency drifts past 2 seconds in Google Docs above roughly 5,000 words.
  • Goals stay shallow on technical writing and code-adjacent prose.
  • Pro monthly at $30 versus $12 annual punishes anyone testing the product.

Right for

Writers who draft long-form prose and emails across multiple audiences.

Avoid if

Engineers who write API documentation and technical references.

The Power User

The Power User

Daily human experience, onboarding, polish, learning curve, reliability
8.2/10

Tone detection catches the emails that would have landed harsher than intended, but the mobile keyboard drags.

“Grammarly has become my daily writing companion that catches errors I'd miss even after proofreading. Worth the premium subscription for anyone who writes regularly, though it can be overzealous with suggestions.”

I've been using Grammarly Premium daily for over a year, and it's transformed how I approach writing. The browser extension seamlessly checks everything from emails to social posts, catching not just typos but awkward phrasing and clarity issues. What surprised me most was how it improved my writing over time - I make fewer mistakes now because I've learned from its suggestions.

The tone detection feature has saved me from sending emails that sounded harsher than intended. However, it sometimes flags perfectly good sentences as unclear, especially with technical writing. The mobile keyboard is decent but occasionally laggy. Overall, it's become indispensable - I feel naked writing without that green checkmark.

Ease of Use9.2

It just works everywhere I write - browser, desktop app, even my phone.

Mobile Experience6.5

The keyboard works but feels clunky and drains battery noticeably.

Onboarding Experience8.5

Setup was instant, though understanding all the features took a few weeks.

Reliability7.8

Usually solid, but occasionally the extension freezes or suggestions take forever to load.

Value for Money7.5

Premium is pricey but pays for itself if you write professionally.

Pros

  • Works seamlessly across all platforms and websites
  • Tone detection prevents communication mishaps
  • Actually improves your writing skills over time

Cons

  • Can be overly prescriptive with style suggestions
  • Mobile keyboard is sluggish and battery-hungry
  • Premium price feels steep for casual users

Right for

Anyone who has sent an email that landed harsher than they meant it to.

Avoid if

Anyone whose writing day happens mostly on a phone keyboard.

The Skeptic

The Skeptic

Contrarian. Watch-outs, deal-breakers, broken promises, category patterns
5.5/10

Google Docs integration stayed broken for three weeks while the AI features kept arriving.

“After 14 months, I finally switched away from Grammarly - the constant upselling, broken integrations, and tone-deaf AI suggestions became too much to bear.”

I was a paying Grammarly user who genuinely relied on it for client communications and proposals. The basic grammar catching worked, but everything else slowly fell apart. The browser extension would randomly stop working mid-email, forcing me to copy-paste into their web app. Their 'tone detection' became increasingly aggressive, flagging normal business language as 'too harsh' while missing actual clarity issues.

The final straw was when they broke Google Docs integration for three weeks straight. Support just kept sending the same troubleshooting steps. Meanwhile, they kept pushing their new AI features I didn't want instead of fixing core functionality. I switched to ProWritingAid and haven't looked back.

Better Alternatives8.5

ProWritingAid costs less, has better integrations, and actually lets you customize writing rules.

Broken Promises7.5

Premium promised 'advanced clarity suggestions' but mostly just reworded sentences to be more verbose.

Deal Breakers8.0

The Google Docs integration breaking repeatedly made it unusable for my actual workflow.

Missing Features7.0

No way to customize style rules or create team consistency guidelines despite being marketed as a business tool.

Support Nightmares6.5

Support responses were always friendly but never actually solved the technical issues.

Pros

  • Catches basic grammar errors reliably
  • Works across most platforms when it's not broken
  • Clean interface that's easy to understand

Cons

  • Constant integration breakages with Google Docs
  • Aggressive AI suggestions that make writing worse
  • Premium features don't justify the high cost

Right for

Writers who want plain grammar catching without the newer AI layer on top.

Avoid if

Anyone whose drafting lives inside Google Docs for hours at a time.

Buyer Questions

Common questions answered by our AI research team

Pricing

What's the difference between Free and Pro plans?

Free (€0/month) offers mistake-free writing, tone detection, and 100 AI prompts per month. Pro (€12/member/month billed annually, €30 billed monthly) adds full-sentence rewrites, tone adjustment, fluency in English, unlimited personalized suggestions, plagiarism and AI-text detection, and 2,000 AI prompts per month.

Pricing

What does the Enterprise plan include?

Enterprise includes everything in Pro plus proactive AI that works everywhere, dedicated support, BYOK encryption, custom roles and permissions, data loss prevention, cost center visibility, unlimited members, confidential mode, and unlimited generative AI prompts. Pricing requires contacting sales.

Features

Does Grammarly detect AI-generated text?

Yes. Grammarly includes an AI Detector agent that spots AI-generated text, and the Pro plan specifically offers the ability to detect AI generated text as part of its feature set.

Security

Is Grammarly SOC 2 certified?

Yes. Grammarly's SOC 2 (Type 2) report attests to its enterprise-grade system and organization controls regarding security, privacy, availability, and confidentiality.

Pricing

What happens to my Premium subscription if I switch to Pro?

Switching from Premium to Pro cancels the Premium subscription and issues a prorated refund for the remainder of the subscription. Pro includes all the advanced writing features from Premium, like tone suggestions and full-sentence rewrites, plus team features previously only in the Business plan.

Alternatives to Grammarly

Who Grammarly competes with, and how each one differs

Also in AI Writing & Content