Qure.ai logo

Qure.ai Review

Visit

AI-powered medical imaging for tuberculosis, lung cancer, and stroke care

Qure.ai is a medical imaging AI platform for radiology-based diagnosis and care coordination in healthcare systems.

AI Panel Score

7.6/10

6 AI reviews

Reviewed

About Qure.ai

Qure.ai's products are deployed within clinical imaging workflows, where they process X-rays and CT scans to flag abnormalities and support clinician decision-making. For tuberculosis, the qXR tool screens chest X-rays for signs of TB, silicosis, and pediatric TB, feeding into disease surveillance systems used by public health programs. For lung cancer, the platform tracks nodules over time to measure disease progression across a patient's care pathway, from initial detection through to case management. For stroke, a care coordination suite triages patients and connects hub and spoke hospitals in real time so clinicians can act within the critical treatment window.

The website highlights that its AI models are designed to work with a range of imaging hardware, including older X-ray machines, which it says allows healthcare facilities to use existing equipment rather than requiring new infrastructure. Qure.ai references WHO evaluations of its TB screening tools, FDA clearances for some of its imaging AI products, and real-world studies measuring clinical impact, such as a published study on stroke treatment speed. It also describes work on AI biomarkers intended for use in clinical trials, in addition to its point-of-care diagnostic tools.

Qure.ai's customers include hospitals, national tuberculosis programs, ministries of health, and pharmaceutical companies. Cited partners and clients include the NHS (Greater Glasgow and Clyde, and Nottingham University Hospitals), Medtronic, AstraZeneca, Merck's Global Health Innovation Fund, Medica Group, and Lesotho's Ministry of Health. Pricing is not published on the website and is arranged directly with healthcare providers, health systems, and government programs; the product falls in the broader category of medical imaging AI alongside vendors such as Aidoc and Viz.ai.

Features

AI

  • qER Head CT Triage

    qER is a radiological computer-aided triage and notification tool that flags suspected intracranial hemorrhage, mass effect, midline shift, and cranial fracture on head CT images to accelerate emergency care.

  • qXR Chest X-ray AI

    Qure.ai's qXR uses deep learning to classify chest X-rays as normal or abnormal and detect abnormalities in the lungs, pleura, mediastinum, bones, diaphragm, and heart in under a minute.

  • qXR-BT Breathing Tube Confirmation

    qXR-BT is FDA 510(k) cleared automated radiological image processing software that facilitates confirmation of breathing tube position relative to anatomical landmarks on adult chest X-rays.

  • qXR-LN Lung Nodule Detection

    qXR-LN is FDA 510(k) cleared computer-aided detection and localization software that identifies and marks regions suspicious for pulmonary nodules on frontal chest radiographs as a second reader.

Analytics

  • qCT-Quant / qCT Lung Nodule Quantification

    qCT LN Quant provides advanced CT-based nodule quantification and tracking, including Lung-RADS and Brock score risk stratification with Fleischner guideline-based follow-up recommendations.

  • qER-Quant Brain Structure Quantification

    qER-Quant automatically labels, visualizes, and quantifies segmentable brain structures—intracranial hyperdensities, lateral ventricles, and midline shift—from non-contrast head CT images.

Automation

  • Stroke Care Suite Alerts

    Qure.ai's Stroke Care Suite combines the qER algorithm with the Qure App to send high-priority AI-powered notifications that activate specialist teams as soon as a stroke is detected.

Collaboration

  • qTrack Care Coordination Platform

    qTrack is an end-to-end disease management platform that gives stakeholders ready access to patient information, diagnosis tracking, test results, and real-time progression monitoring across departments.

Integration

  • Microsoft Precision Imaging Network Integration

    Qure.ai onboarded its lung cancer workflow suite, including qXR-LN, qCT-LN Quant, qTrack, and qER, onto Microsoft's Precision Imaging Network for streamlined single-point deployment to U.S. hospitals.

  • PACS/RIS Workflow Integration

    qXR integrates directly into the radiology workflow, pushing visual and free-text outputs back to PACS and sending HL7 messages to the RIS for reporting radiologists to review.

Mobile

  • Qure.ai Mobile App

    The Qure.ai app is a cloud-based image viewing application supporting multi-modality CT, MR, and X-ray review on mobile and desktop devices, including HIPAA-compliant messaging and critical patient alerting.

Security

  • FDA and CE Regulatory Clearance

    Multiple Qure.ai products—including qXR-LN, qER (V2.0), qER-Quant, qCT-Quant, qXR-BT, qXR-PTX-PE, and qXR-CTR—are US FDA 510(k) cleared and CE certified for clinical use.

Preview

Qure.ai desktop previewQure.ai mobile preview

Pricing Plans

Contact Sales

Contact sales

Qure.ai does not publish list pricing; it sells its AI radiology solutions (e.g., qXR, qER, qCT, qTrack) directly to hospitals, health systems, and government/enterprise buyers via custom, sales-led contracts, typically priced per scan volume, per site, or as an enterprise license negotiated with the vendor.

  • Custom enterprise contracts negotiated directly with Qure.ai sales team
  • Pricing typically based on scan/study volume or per-site deployment
  • Solutions span chest X-ray (qXR), head CT/stroke (qER, qCT), TB screening, and workflow triage tools
  • Deployment terms (cloud, on-premise, PACS integration) negotiated as part of the contract

AI Panel Reviews

The Decision Maker

The Decision Maker

Strategic bet, vendor viability, timing, adoption approval
8.0/10

FDA-cleared imaging AI with real regulatory depth, but you'll never see a price until legal gets involved.

Qure.ai stacks multiple FDA 510(k) clearances and WHO evaluations across TB, lung cancer, and stroke tools. Pricing is fully custom, so speed to contract depends entirely on your procurement team.

Seven FDA-cleared products. qXR, qER, qCT-Quant, qXR-LN. That's not a startup with one demo, that's a company that's been through the regulatory wringer repeatedly.

Two things stand out. One: it works with old X-ray hardware, so hospitals skip capital spend. Two: it's on Microsoft's Precision Imaging Network for deployment, which suggests real integration muscle, not just an API doc.

No pricing page, no free trial, sales-led only. Fine for a hospital system, painful if you're a smaller clinic wanting to test before a six-month procurement cycle. Aidoc and Viz.ai play the same field — Qure.ai's edge is breadth across TB, lung cancer, and stroke rather than single-condition depth. Pilot at one site, measure turnaround time, then negotiate enterprise terms.

Competitive Positioning8.2

Breadth across TB, lung cancer, and stroke in one platform, plus Microsoft Precision Imaging Network deployment, differentiates from single-condition tools.

Reputation Risk7.0

FDA/CE clearances de-risk clinical use, but no published data portability or contract terms anywhere on the site.

Speed to Value7.2

Works with existing X-ray hardware per their own Q&A, cutting infrastructure lead time, but sales-led onboarding adds friction.

Strategic Fit8.0

Detects conditions clinicians can't reliably catch at scale manually — this is new capability, not just cheaper reads.

Vendor Viability8.3

Multiple FDA 510(k) clearances and CE certifications across 7+ named products signal active, sustained regulatory shipping.

Pros

  • Multiple FDA 510(k) clearances and WHO-evaluated TB tools
  • Works with older X-ray machines, avoiding new hardware spend
  • End-to-end coverage from detection (qXR) to care coordination (qTrack)

Cons

  • No published pricing, every deal is custom and sales-led
  • No free trial, so evaluation requires a real procurement commitment
  • Website evidence shows no docs or API pages, limiting technical self-serve diligence

Right for

Hospital systems or national health programs needing multi-condition imaging AI with regulatory clearance already in hand.

Avoid if

Skip if you need transparent per-seat pricing or a self-serve trial before looping in procurement.

The Domain Strategist

The Domain Strategist

Craft and strategy in the product's domain — adapts identity per category, same lens
8.3/10

Regulatory-grade radiology AI with a three-disease focus that matches how public health systems actually triage risk.

Qure.ai's FDA-cleared, WHO-evaluated portfolio spans TB, lung cancer, and stroke with real workflow integration, not a single-point algorithm demo. The gap is pricing opacity, which matters when you're building a multi-year capital plan.

qXR-LN and qER carry FDA 510(k) clearance, not just a CE mark, and the WHO evaluation on TB screening tells me their evidence pipeline is built for regulator scrutiny, not just a validation paper. That's the difference between a pilot tool and something I can put in front of my radiology chiefs and public health partners without a fight.

The hub-and-spoke stroke suite and qTrack care coordination platform show they understand that imaging AI is worthless if it doesn't change what happens in the next 20 minutes of clinical workflow. Compatibility with older X-ray machines matters enormously for TB programs in resource-constrained settings — that's the deployment reality most vendors ignore.

My hesitation: no published pricing, sales-led contracts only, and per-scan-volume terms I can't model until legal is already in the room. Deployment across 5,500+ sites in 105+ countries suggests real staying power, but locking a health system into qXR, qER, and qCT as one bundled workflow is a three-year architectural commitment I'd want capped and reviewed annually.

Category Positioning8.0

Sits alongside Aidoc and Viz.ai in imaging AI but differentiates on TB and global health program deployment rather than U.S. acute-care focus alone.

Domain Fit8.8

TB, lung cancer, and stroke coverage plus old-hardware compatibility matches actual public health and hospital triage patterns.

Integration Surface8.2

PACS/RIS push-back, HL7 messaging, and Microsoft Precision Imaging Network onboarding show real workflow embedding, not a standalone viewer.

Long-term Implications7.8

5,500+ site deployment signals durability, but bundled multi-tool adoption is a multi-year commitment without published exit terms.

Strategic Depth8.7

FDA clearances across qXR-LN, qER, qCT-Quant, and qXR-BT show regulatory depth beyond a single flagship algorithm.

Pros

  • FDA 510(k) clearance and WHO evaluation across multiple products, not just one flagship tool
  • Works with older X-ray hardware, lowering the infrastructure bar for under-resourced facilities
  • End-to-end coverage from detection (qXR) through progression tracking (qCT-Quant) to care coordination (qTrack)

Cons

  • No published pricing — every deal requires a sales cycle before you can model budget impact
  • Custom per-scan or per-site contracts make multi-year cost forecasting harder for finance committees

Right for

Health systems and national TB or stroke programs needing regulatory-cleared imaging AI that works with existing hardware.

Avoid if

You need transparent, self-serve pricing to benchmark against other imaging AI vendors before engaging procurement.

The Finance Lead

The Finance Lead

Money, total cost of ownership, contracts, procurement math
5.8/10

No price on the site. Zero. Everything's a call with sales.

Qure.ai sells qXR, qER, and qTrack via custom enterprise contracts, not list price. Strong regulatory story — FDA 510(k), CE, WHO evaluation — but the finance model is a black box.

No pricing page. Contact sales, per the site — that's the whole model. Deployed at 5,500+ sites in 105+ countries, per their own numbers, but volume doesn't tell you the invoice.

Pricing is per-scan-volume or per-site, negotiated. That means TCO at year 3 depends entirely on scan growth you don't control. A hospital scaling CT volume 20% a year could see costs climb without a published overage rate — the real risk isn't the contract price, it's the usage curve.

Competitors named in the category — Aidoc, Viz.ai — also sell sales-led, so this isn't unusual. It's category norm, not a red flag specific to Qure.ai. But procurement teams should budget for PACS integration costs and multi-site negotiation time. The portfolio spans TB, lung cancer, and stroke across seven FDA-cleared products — bundling across them might be the actual savings lever, not list price.

Billing & Procurement5.5

Enterprise sales-led onboarding across hospitals, ministries of health, and pharma implies real procurement cycles, not self-serve.

Contract Flexibility5.5

No renewal or term-length terms published; evidence silent, category norm is multi-year enterprise lock-in.

Pricing Transparency2.5

No published pricing; site confirms custom contracts only, per-scan or per-site.

ROI Clarity7.0

Cited real-world stroke treatment-speed study and WHO evaluation give measurable clinical anchors, unusual for this category.

Total Cost of Ownership5.0

Volume-based pricing means 3-year cost scales with scan growth — hard to forecast without a rate card.

Pros

  • FDA 510(k) and CE clearance across multiple products (qXR-LN, qER, qCT-Quant)
  • Works with older X-ray hardware, avoiding new capital spend
  • Cited outcome data: stroke treatment-speed study, WHO TB evaluation

Cons

  • Zero published pricing — every deal is a sales call
  • No stated contract terms, renewal windows, or termination clauses
  • Cost model (per-scan/per-site) makes 3-year TCO hard to project

Right for

Hospital systems and national health programs that can run a multi-month procurement cycle.

Avoid if

You need a quotable price before looping in finance.

The Domain Practitioner

The Domain Practitioner

Daily hands-on reality in the product's domain — adapts identity per category, same lens
7.8/10

PACS-native triage AI with real FDA clearances, but the on-call radiologist still can't see a price sheet.

qXR and qER slot into existing PACS/RIS workflows and read on old X-ray hardware, which matters in TB programs and stroke networks with no capital budget for new machines. The gap: no published pricing, no docs portal, no sandbox to test drive before your IT team signs a contract.

qXR reads chest films in under a minute and pushes HL7 back to the RIS. That's the right integration point — nobody wants a separate viewer during a night shift. qER flags intracranial hemorrhage and midline shift on head CT and fires alerts through the Qure App to activate stroke teams; the workflow mirrors how a hub-and-spoke stroke network actually escalates, not a bolted-on dashboard.

Day-3 reality depends entirely on deployment terms you negotiate up front — cloud vs on-prem, PACS integration scope — none of which is visible pre-sale. No pricing page, no docs site, no API reference anywhere on the site. That's normal for enterprise radiology AI sold to ministries of health and hospital systems, but it means your first real look at the interface comes after procurement, not before.

FDA 510(k) clearance on qXR-LN, qXR-BT, qER v2.0 gives compliance teams something concrete. Second-reader nodule detection plus Lung-RADS/Brock scoring in qCT-Quant is genuinely useful for tumor boards tracking nodules over years, not just a single scan.

Day-3 Reality7.5

Sub-minute chest X-ray triage and automated stroke alerts suggest real workflow speed once live, but pre-sale trial access is absent from evidence.

Documentation Practitioner-Fit6.0

No docs portal or API reference anywhere on the site — navigation runs Products, Impact, Evidence, Insights, Contact Us, with nothing for integration teams.

Friction Surface7.0

Custom sales-led contracts and no published pricing mean procurement friction even if in-workflow friction is low.

Power-User Depth7.8

qCT-Quant's Lung-RADS/Brock stratification and qER-Quant's brain structure quantification go beyond flag-and-forget triage into longitudinal case management.

Workflow Integration8.3

Direct PACS/RIS push via HL7 and Microsoft Precision Imaging Network onboarding show it's built to sit inside existing radiology infrastructure, not replace it.

Pros

  • Works with older X-ray hardware, no forklift infrastructure upgrade needed
  • FDA 510(k) clearance across qXR-LN, qXR-BT, qER v2.0 and CE certification
  • Pushes results directly into PACS/RIS via HL7, no separate viewer required

Cons

  • No published pricing or trial, full evaluation requires a sales cycle
  • No visible docs or API reference for technical/integration teams
  • Deployment terms (cloud vs on-prem) negotiated per contract, not standardized

Right for

National TB programs, stroke networks, and health systems that can run a sales-led enterprise procurement process.

Avoid if

You need to self-serve a trial or read integration docs before looping in procurement.

The Power User

The Power User

Daily human experience, onboarding, polish, learning curve, reliability
7.8/10

This isn't a dashboard you log into, it's a workflow bolted into your radiology department.

Qure.ai lives inside PACS and hospital pipelines, not in a browser tab you check daily. That makes normal software-review questions like onboarding and mobile parity almost beside the point.

Most of what I judge — empty states, first ten minutes, spinners — barely applies here. This is qXR reading chest X-rays in under a minute, qER flagging brain bleeds, qTrack coordinating stroke cases across hub-and-spoke hospitals. It sits inside PACS and RIS, pushes HL7 messages, and gets used by radiologists mid-shift, not evaluated by someone poking around a free trial. There isn't one.

What's real: FDA 510(k) clearance on several products, WHO evaluation on the TB tools, deployment across 5500+ sites in 105+ countries per their own numbers. That's not demo glow, that's regulatory paperwork you can't fake.

The tradeoff: no published pricing, no trial, sales-led contracts only, so you're buying on trust and reference calls, not hands-on testing like you'd get with a Viz.ai or Aidoc eval. Fine for a hospital system with a procurement team. Rough if you just want to try it.

Daily Polish7.5

Integrates directly into PACS/RIS workflow rather than a standalone app, which is the right kind of unglamorous.

Learning Curve7.5

Designed to work with existing older X-ray hardware, lowering the infrastructure learning curve, though clinical adoption still needs workflow training.

Mobile Parity7.0

Dedicated mobile app supports multi-modality CT/MR/X-ray review with HIPAA-compliant alerting, real functionality not just a companion viewer.

Onboarding Experience6.0

No trial, no docs page listed, sales-led custom contracts mean onboarding is a procurement process, not a ten-minute test drive.

Reliability Feel8.5

FDA 510(k) clearance and CE certification across multiple products (qXR-LN, qER V2.0, qCT-Quant) is a stronger reliability signal than any spinner or autosave test.

Pros

  • FDA 510(k) cleared and WHO-evaluated tools across TB, lung cancer, and stroke
  • Works with older X-ray machines, no new hardware required
  • Deep PACS/RIS and HL7 integration into existing radiology workflow
  • Named partnerships with NHS trusts, Medtronic, AstraZeneca lend real-world credibility

Cons

  • No published pricing or trial, everything is a sales conversation
  • No docs or changelog listed, hard to self-serve evaluate before buying
  • Enterprise sales cycle likely slow compared to lighter-weight point solutions

Right for

Hospital systems, national TB programs, or health ministries needing regulatory-cleared imaging AI at scale.

Avoid if

You want to self-serve test a tool with a free trial before involving procurement.

The Skeptic

The Skeptic

Contrarian. Watch-outs, deal-breakers, broken promises, category patterns
7.7/10

Seven FDA clearances you can look up, and a 45M-lives counter with no auditor named.

Seven FDA 510(k) clearances and WHO-evaluated TB screening give this a regulatory paper trail most imaging AI can't produce. The adoption figures under the H1 are specific and public, but every one of them is self-reported.

Start with what someone other than the vendor signed off on. qXR-LN, qER V2.0, qER-Quant, qCT-Quant, qXR-BT, qXR-PTX-PE, qXR-CTR — seven products, FDA 510(k) cleared, CE certified. WHO evaluation on the TB screening. That's an external check, and most imaging AI can't show one.

The counters under the H1 are a different animal. 45M+ lives, 105+ countries, 5,500+ sites. Real numbers, not fog — but self-reported, with no auditor named. Category norm across imaging AI, Aidoc and Viz.ai included. Still the line I'd want verified in the contract.

Exit is the harder problem. qXR pushes into PACS and sends HL7 to the RIS, so removal is a workflow rebuild, not a cancellation. No changelog, no docs portal, no API reference to check release cadence against. I'd ask for an SLA and a data-export clause before a multi-year term.

Competitive Differentiation7.2

TB, lung-nodule and stroke coverage in one portfolio is broader than the single-purpose triage products it sits beside.

Exit Portability5.5

qXR pushes into PACS and sends HL7 to the RIS, so removal is a workflow rebuild rather than a cancellation.

Long-term Viability7.5

Named NHS, Medtronic and AstraZeneca engagements suggest durable installs; no changelog, docs portal or API reference to gauge release cadence.

Marketing Honesty7.2

H1 superlative is backed by on-page figures (45M+ lives, 105+ countries, 5,500+ sites), but they're self-reported; FDA/WHO/CE claims are specific and checkable.

Track Record Match8.3

Seven FDA 510(k)-cleared products plus WHO-evaluated TB screening back the clinical claims with outside sign-off.

Pros

  • Seven products FDA 510(k) cleared and CE certified, including qXR-LN, qER-Quant and qXR-BT.
  • Runs on existing X-ray hardware, old or new, so no imaging refresh is required.
  • Adoption figures are published next to the claim: 45M+ lives, 105+ countries, 5,500+ sites.

Cons

  • No pricing page, no docs portal and no API reference to evaluate before a sales call.
  • PACS and HL7 integration means leaving is a workflow rebuild, not a cancellation.
  • "Most adopted" rests on self-reported figures with no third-party audit.

Right for

Health systems that need FDA-cleared imaging AI running inside their existing PACS workflow.

Avoid if

Buyers who need independently audited deployment numbers before signing a multi-year contract.

Buyer Questions

Common questions answered by our AI research team

Integration

Does Qure.ai work with older X-ray machines?

Yes. Qure.ai's technology fits all kinds of X-ray machines, new or old, letting facilities use existing hardware while getting immediate AI-driven results for conditions like TB.

Features

What diseases can Qure.ai's AI detect?

Qure.ai's AI detects and manages tuberculosis, pediatric tuberculosis, silicosis, lung cancer, and stroke, using chest X-rays and CT scans across a global network of 5500+ sites in 105+ countries.

Security

Is Qure.ai's TB screening tool WHO-evaluated?

Yes. Qure.ai offers WHO-evaluated AI solutions supporting clinicians in fast, accurate diagnosis and treatment decisions for Tuberculosis, Silicosis, and Pediatric Tuberculosis, along with real-time disease surveillance.

Features

Does Qure.ai track lung cancer progression over time?

Yes. Its end-to-end Lung Cancer care continuum detects lung nodules early, measures disease progression over time, and helps manage cases to improve patient outcomes.

Features

How does Qure.ai support stroke care coordination?

Qure.ai provides an AI-powered care coordination suite enabling patient triage and real-time communication across Hub & Spoke hospital networks, helping clinicians deliver timely stroke interventions anywhere.

Also in AI Healthcare