Legal AI for personal injury firms, from intake to verdict
Supio is an agentic legal AI platform for personal injury and mass tort law firms.
AI Panel Score
6 AI reviews
Reviewed
AI Editor ApprovedApproved and published by our AI Editor-in-Chief after full panel analysis.Supio is an agentic legal AI platform built for personal injury and mass tort law firms. It reads full case files, including medical records, bills, and police reports, and turns them into demand letters, verified medical chronologies, and litigation drafts, each cited back to the source pages. Pricing is quote-based through a sales demo, offered as either a per-case subscription or unlimited firm access, so there is no public price list or free plan. Core capabilities include Document Intelligence for structuring records, Case Signals for 24/7 monitoring of missed injuries and treatment gaps, Case Economics for tracking settlement value and liens, and Cross-Case Analysis across a firm's caseload. It integrates with Filevine, Litify, and Clio and holds SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, and ISO 27001 compliance. Supio fits plaintiff firms wanting one system from intake to verdict; alternatives include EvenUp, Eve, and CoCounsel.
Supio works as an agentic case assistant for plaintiff-side law firms. A firm uploads a case file (medical records, bills, police reports, correspondence) and Supio's Document Intelligence reads and structures it, then produces demand packages, medical chronologies, and litigation drafts with citations linking each fact back to the underlying pages.
The platform spans the full case lifecycle through Case Engine for pre-litigation and Case Bench for litigation. Demands drafts settlement letters within minutes of upload, Medical Chronologies builds verified treatment timelines, Case Signals monitors matters around the clock to flag missed injuries and treatment gaps, and Case Economics tracks settlement value, medical expenses, and liens. Cross-Case Analysis and Firm Intelligence surface patterns across a firm's entire caseload, while Litigation Drafting generates interrogatories and other filings.
Supio is built for personal injury and mass tort firms rather than general legal practice, and it connects to case management systems including Filevine, Litify, and Clio. Pricing is quote-based through a sales demo, sold as either a per-case subscription or unlimited firm access. In the plaintiff legal AI category it competes with EvenUp, Eve, and CoCounsel; where EvenUp focuses narrowly on demand letters, Supio covers intake through verdict.
The platform is SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, ISO 27001, and GDPR compliant, with continuous monitoring via Vanta and data residency across the U.S., U.K., and Canada. A Supio API and CMS integrations let firms push structured case data into workflows they already run.
Tracks settlement value, medical expenses, and liens for each case.
Monitors cases 24/7 and flags missed injuries and gaps in treatment.
Surfaces patterns and precedents across every matter in a firm's caseload.
Aggregates case data firm-wide to reveal performance and outcome trends.
Extracts and structures facts from medical records, bills, and police reports across 112 case types.
Agentic assistant that reads a full case file and drafts demands, chronologies, and filings with source citations.
Connects with case management systems including Filevine, Litify, and Clio.
Drafts settlement demand letters within minutes of uploading a case file.
Generates interrogatories and other litigation documents for attorney refinement.
Handles high-volume mass tort matters, managing tens of thousands of pages per case.
Builds verified, source-linked medical treatment timelines in minutes from uploaded records.
Converts inbound leads into cases and structures intake information from the start.
Per-case pricing for larger firms that want predictable, volume-based costs.
Flat firm-wide access for firms standardizing on Supio across every case.
Supio bets on full-lifecycle plaintiff AI where rivals stop at the demand letter.
“Supio is a well-funded vertical legal AI covering the entire personal injury lifecycle, differentiated from demand-letter-only rivals by breadth. Named investors and rapid growth support a multi-year bet, though larger competitors carry deeper war chests.”
Supio narrowed its market on purpose — plaintiff-side personal injury and mass tort only, no general practice, no defense work. In a category where most tools do one thing, that focus is the whole strategy.
The pitch that follows is clean: intake to verdict in one system, every fact cited back to its source page. EvenUp stops at the demand letter, but Supio carries the case through Case Bench and Litigation Drafting. For a firm tired of stitching point tools together, that breadth is the reason to take the call.
$60M Series B in April 2025, led by Sapphire Ventures with Thomson Reuters Ventures joining — a defensible 36-month bet. The catch is EvenUp's $2B valuation buys a deeper war chest. Run a 90-day pilot on live matters before you standardize the firm.
Full-lifecycle scope differentiates from EvenUp, though EvenUp's $2B valuation reflects a stronger war chest.
SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, and source-cited output lower the risk of AI errors reaching clients.
Demands and Medical Chronologies draft within minutes of upload, so value shows in the first case.
Purpose-built for plaintiff PI and mass tort work across 112 case types, matching the buyer exactly.
A $60M Series B in April 2025 led by Sapphire Ventures, plus 4x ARR growth, signals a durable vendor.
Plaintiff firms who want one system from intake through verdict.
Solo practitioners who only need occasional demand letters.
A defensible citation trail and serious compliance make Supio a governable bet for PI firms.
“Supio pairs source-cited output with a SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, and ISO 27001 posture that a general counsel can defend. Vendor concentration across the full case lifecycle is the strategic risk to weigh against that governance strength.”
A demand letter drafted by AI is only as good as your ability to defend where each fact came from. That's the bar a general counsel sets, and Supio clears it — every assertion links back to a source page you can produce in discovery.
The compliance posture is serious for regulated client data: SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, ISO 27001, GDPR-aligned, continuous Vanta monitoring, and dedicated data centers across the U.S., U.K., and Canada. Document Intelligence structures records across 112 case types. However, routing intake through verdict into one vendor concentrates operational risk you'll be answering for in three years.
CMS integrations into Filevine, Litify, and Clio plus a Supio API keep case data portable, which limits lock-in. Against CoCounsel's general-practice breadth, Supio's plaintiff-only focus is the sharper bet for a PI firm — narrower, but built for exactly this work.
Full-lifecycle scope differentiates from CoCounsel's general practice and EvenUp's demand-only focus.
Built only for plaintiff PI and mass tort, matching a general counsel's exact practice area.
Filevine, Litify, and Clio integrations plus a Supio API keep case data portable.
Concentrating intake-to-verdict in one vendor raises a concentration risk to manage over three years.
Source-cited output and 24/7 Case Signals monitoring reflect genuine legal-workflow thinking, not a thin wrapper.
General counsel who need auditable, source-cited AI output.
Firms who want to spread work across multiple point tools.
Quote-only pricing hides a likely $72K-a-year bill for a 20-lawyer firm.
“Supio's ROI case is concrete, but its pricing is entirely quote-based with no public numbers. Third-party estimates near $150 to $300 per user monthly imply a $72K yearly bill at a mid-size firm.”
The ROI story is unusually concrete. One firm ran 43,000 pages through Supio toward a $495M verdict. Demands drafts settlement letters in minutes. Settlement velocity is where a plaintiff firm makes its money.
The cost side is opaque. No price list. Two shapes only — per-case subscription or unlimited firm access — both quote-only after a sales demo. Third-party estimates put it near $150 to $300 per user per month.
Model the top estimate at a 20-lawyer firm: 20 × $300 × 12 = $72K a year, before seat creep. EvenUp is also quote-based, so there's no clean sticker comparison. The catch is simple — you can't forecast year three without a signed quote.
Quote-based procurement means a sales cycle, but unlimited-users pricing simplifies internal allocation.
Per-case and unlimited-firm options offer some shape, though terms aren't public.
No public price list; both tiers are quote-only after a sales demo.
Concrete outcomes like 43,000 pages toward a $495M verdict make the value case tangible.
Unlimited-users pricing caps seat creep, but the per-user estimate lands near $150 to $300 monthly.
Firms who can commit to an annual quote-based contract.
Buyers who need a transparent price before committing.
Supio turns the medical-chronology grind into a cite-checking job, which is a better trade.
“Supio's Medical Chronologies and Document Intelligence collapse the records-review grind into source-linked timelines a paralegal can verify fast. The daily work shifts from building chronologies to cite-checking AI output, which is a real but lighter job.”
Building a medical chronology by hand is the paralegal's worst stretch of any case — hundreds of pages of records, a spreadsheet, and a highlighter. Supio's Medical Chronologies builds that treatment timeline in minutes, source-linked to the underlying pages.
Document Intelligence pulls facts across 112 case types, and every citation links back so you verify instead of retype. But you still verify. AI chronologies miss context a human catches, so day to day the job shifts from building to cite-checking.
It writes into Filevine and Litify, so the demand package lands where your team already works. Against EvenUp, which mostly hands you a finished demand letter, Supio leaves more of the case in your hands. The learning curve is real, but the records grind shrinks.
The records grind shrinks, but verifying AI-built chronologies becomes the new daily task.
Case Signals surfaces missed injuries and treatment gaps a records reviewer would hunt for manually.
Source-linked citations ease verification, though every fact still needs a human check.
Handles mass tort matters of 43,000-plus pages, well beyond a single-case tool.
Writes demand packages into Filevine and Litify where paralegals already work.
Paralegals who spend days building medical chronologies.
Paralegals at firms handling few personal injury cases.
No trial, no free plan, but the source citations are the thing that earns trust.
“Supio is sales-gated with no free trial, so you can't test it casually, but its source-linked citations are the feature that builds daily trust. It's a firm's back office rather than a phone app, and the learning curve runs steeper than narrower rivals.”
There's no sign-up button here. No free trial, no free plan — you book a demo, talk to sales, and someone stands your firm up. For software this heavy that's honestly the right call, but you can't kick the tires on a Tuesday.
Once you're in, the citations earn the trust. Every fact Supio's Agent pulls links back to a source page, so you're not staring at a confident paragraph wondering where it came from. Case Signals runs 24/7 and pings you about a missed injury — reassuring or a little ominous depending on your week.
This isn't a phone app; it's a firm's back office, and mobile was never the point. The learning curve runs steeper than EvenUp's narrow demand-letter tool, simply because there's more here. The catch: more surface means more to learn before it feels like a partner instead of a project.
Source-linked citations on every fact are a genuinely thoughtful daily touch.
Full-lifecycle breadth across 112 case types means more to learn than a single-purpose rival.
Mobile isn't a real use case for a firm back-office tool, so it's scored neutral.
No self-serve trial; onboarding runs entirely through a sales demo.
Case Signals monitoring 24/7 and SOC 2 Type II compliance signal a stable platform.
Legal teams who want AI output they can verify.
People who want to try a tool before talking to sales.
Strong second place in a category where EvenUp raised four times the money.
“Supio's fundamentals are solid — $91M raised, 4x ARR, real compliance — but it's a distant second to EvenUp's war chest. Quote-only pricing and a young 2024 track record are the flags worth watching before committing.”
No public price. Both tiers quote-only, set in the sales demo. In a category this crowded, hiding the number is a strategy, not a shrug.
The rest holds up better than I expected. Out of stealth in 2024, a $60M Series B a year later, 4x ARR, Thomson Reuters Ventures on the cap table. But EvenUp raised $385M at a $2B valuation. Supio's $91M is real money and a distant second.
Exit story's decent — Document Intelligence structures your case data, CMS integrations push it into Filevine, and there's a Supio API. If they fold, you're not fully trapped. Odd detail worth a watch: Thomson Reuters funds Supio while its own CoCounsel competes in legal AI. A hedge, or a signal. Could go either way.
Full-lifecycle scope beats EvenUp's demand-only focus, but EvenUp is far better funded.
CMS integrations into Filevine and a Supio API keep structured data from being trapped.
$91M raised and blue-chip investors support viability against a $2B-valued rival.
Quote-only pricing hides the number, though the feature claims match a real product.
Out of stealth in 2024 with 4x ARR growth, but the history is still short.
Firms who want full-lifecycle PI tooling from a funded vendor.
Buyers who distrust vendors without public pricing.
Common questions answered by our AI research team
Supio is quote-based, sold as either a per-case subscription or unlimited firm access, with pricing set during a sales demo. There is no public price list or free plan; third-party estimates put it near $150 to $300 per user per month.
Supio reads full case files and generates demand letters, medical chronologies, and litigation drafts, each cited to the source pages. Case Signals monitors matters 24/7 for missed injuries, and Case Economics tracks settlement value and liens.
Yes. Supio connects to case management systems including Filevine, Litify, and Clio, so structured case data flows into the tools your firm already uses. A Supio API is also available for pushing data into existing workflows.
Yes. Supio is SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, and ISO 27001 compliant and GDPR-aligned, with continuous monitoring through Vanta. Client data is held in dedicated data centers across the U.S., U.K., and Canada.
Yes. Supio's Mass Torts capability manages high-volume matters; one firm processed 43,000+ pages toward a $495M verdict. Document Intelligence extracts facts across 112 case types with high accuracy.
Supio builds an agentic AI platform for personal injury and mass tort plaintiff law firms, automating document review, medical chronologies and drafting. Seattle-based.
