AI platform for company knowledge, workflows, and learning
Sana is an AI platform for enterprise knowledge, workflow automation, and corporate learning.
AI Panel Score
6 AI reviews
Reviewed
AI Editor ApprovedApproved and published by our AI Editor-in-Chief after full panel analysis.Sana works as an AI layer over a company's existing tools and knowledge bases. Users can search across connected apps to find information, ask questions and get answers grounded in internal content, and trigger automated workflows that span multiple systems. The platform also generates documents, analyses, and dashboards from natural language requests, aiming to reduce manual work involved in producing reports or summarizing information.
On the learning side, Sana Learn combines functions typically found in separate tools: a learning management system (LMS), a learning experience platform (LXP), a content authoring tool, and a virtual classroom. It includes an AI tutor for learners, automated administrative features for managing training programs, and analytics for tracking learning outcomes. Content creation is positioned as significantly faster than traditional authoring methods, with AI assistance built into the creation workflow.
Sana is designed for organizations looking to consolidate AI-driven knowledge access, workflow automation, and employee training into a single platform rather than using separate point solutions. It competes with a mix of tools depending on use case, including enterprise search and knowledge assistants like Glean, and learning platforms such as Docebo, Cornerstone, and 360Learning. Pricing is not listed publicly on the homepage and requires contacting sales.
Sana is a web-based platform that integrates with a company's existing applications and data sources to power its search, automation, and content generation features. As of the current homepage, Sana has become part of Workday, with Sana Learn continuing as a distinct product line.
Uses AI to tailor courses and learning paths to each learner's existing knowledge level and skip material they already know.
Automatically transforms uploaded PDFs and other source material into interactive courses.
Automatically tags content with the appropriate skill category and level using AI.
Lets users chat with Sana about learning data and source material to get instant answers and uncover insights.
Generates AI-created dashboards that answer performance questions in real time and can be shared with partners and managers for accountability.
Converts courses into over 100 languages automatically to support global training programs.
Provides a Programs feature that enables automatic learner enrollment rules and automated program delivery.
Lets multiple team members co-edit courses in a real-time editor with AI writing suggestions and branded templates.
Combines an LMS, LXP, authoring tool, and virtual classroom into one AI-native platform for creating, hosting, and managing training.
Allows organizations to mirror their brand experience in courses and the UI with custom fonts, colors, and logos.
Offers plug-and-play integrations with HR systems and CRM platforms to support automation like enrollment and reminders.
Supports importing existing content from other LMS platforms via SCORM and from libraries such as LinkedIn Learning and Coursera.
Enterprise plans include SSO, SLA, API access, and HR system connectors for secure enterprise deployment.
For individuals trying out Sana
For teams needing unlimited usage and popular integrations
Custom pricing for large organizations needing enterprise-grade security and support; contact sales for details
Workday bought it. That answers the viability question and raises three new ones.
“Sana got acquired by Workday, so the vendor-risk question flips from survival to roadmap control. Strong bundle of search, automation, and LMS — but you're now betting on Workday's priorities, not Sana's.”
$30/seat gets you unlimited queries, Asana and Zendesk integrations, model choice between OpenAI and Claude. That's competitive with Glean on search and undercuts Docebo or Cornerstone if you actually need the LMS side too.
Here's the catch. Sana is now part of Workday, with Sana Learn kept as a separate line. Acquisitions mean roadmaps change to serve the parent's strategy, not yours — ask what happens to the standalone product in 18 months before you sign anything multi-year.
The bundle itself is real: unified LMS/LXP/authoring/virtual classroom, SCORM import, SAML SSO on Enterprise. Consolidating three tools into one is the actual pitch, not just cheaper search. Pilot Sana Learn with one department. Don't consolidate your whole stack until Workday says what stays independent.
Competes directly with Glean and Docebo but lacks public case studies or logos to confirm enterprise adoption.
Workday ownership reads as safe to a board, but 'Sana Learn continuing as a distinct product line' is a hedge worth flagging.
AI Course Converter and prebuilt HRIS/CRM integrations suggest fast setup, though no free trial exists to verify time-to-value.
Consolidates LMS, LXP, authoring, and workflow automation into one $30/seat platform rather than just cutting cost on one tool.
Acquired by Workday — strong balance sheet, but product-line autonomy is now uncertain.
Mid-market companies wanting to replace separate LMS, authoring, and knowledge-search tools with one contract.
Skip if you need certainty on long-term product direction before a multi-year training platform commitment.
A convergence platform for search, workflow, and learning — but convergence has a governance cost.
“Sana merges enterprise search, workflow automation, and a full LMS/LXP stack into one system, which is architecturally ambitious but taxonomically risky. The Workday acquisition changes the three-year calculus more than any feature does.”
Collapsing search, document generation, workflow automation, and Sana Learn's LMS/LXP/authoring/virtual-classroom stack into one platform is a genuinely different information architecture than most KM stacks run. Most orgs keep learning content and operational knowledge in separate systems with separate taxonomies for good reason — content lifecycle, compliance retention, and access models differ. Sana's bet is that unification beats specialization; that's unproven at scale against Docebo or Cornerstone on the learning side, or Glean on pure enterprise search.
The 1,000-10,000 documents per integration cap on Team/Free tiers is a real constraint for any org with a mature knowledge base — that's a corpus-size ceiling, not a seat-count one. SCORM import and LinkedIn Learning/Coursera library support show real migration thinking for learning teams.
The Workday acquisition is the bigger three-year question. Being folded into an HCM suite changes roadmap incentives away from open knowledge architecture toward HR-centric workflows.
Sits at the intersection of Glean-style enterprise search and Docebo/Cornerstone-style learning platforms, a genuinely underserved convergence niche.
Combining LMS/LXP/authoring/virtual classroom with enterprise search fits consolidation-minded buyers but conflicts with how most KM teams separate content governance from operational knowledge.
Confluence, SharePoint, Notion, Google Drive, SCORM import, and an Enterprise-tier MCP client cover the standard KM integration surface well.
Workday ownership introduces roadmap risk; a 10,000-document-per-integration cap on the $30/user Team plan forces early enterprise-tier migration for content-heavy orgs.
AI course conversion, skill tagging, and dashboard generation show real authoring depth, but no docs/changelog evidence to judge model grounding rigor.
Mid-size organizations ready to consolidate learning content management and enterprise search under one taxonomy.
Avoid if your knowledge base already exceeds 10,000 documents per integration or you need governance independent of an HCM vendor roadmap.
$30/seat looks clean until you hit the 50-seat wall and the Enterprise call.
“Team plan is priced and capped at 50 members. Past that, it's contact sales — and the real number disappears.”
$30/user/month. Team tier caps at 50 members, 10,000 docs per integration. 50 seats × $30 × 12 = $18K/year. Fine for a mid-size team, but growth past 50 forces Enterprise, and Enterprise pricing is not published. That's where TCO stops being predictable.
No SSO on Team — SAML and SCIM sit behind Enterprise only. Budget for the upsell if security review is coming; it usually is by year 2.
Compare to Glean, also contact-sales at enterprise scale — category norm here, not a Sana-specific flaw. Free tier exists (10 meetings/month, 5 members) but it's a trial funnel, not a real plan. Now folded into Workday post-acquisition — that ownership change is a contract-renegotiation event, not a footnote. Docebo and 360Learning at least publish more pricing signal on the learning side.
Monthly billing on Team is simple; Enterprise DPA and SLA require a full procurement cycle.
No term or auto-renewal data published; Workday acquisition adds renegotiation risk to existing contracts.
Team tier is public at $30/seat, but Enterprise — where SSO and SCIM live — is sales-gated.
10x faster content creation is a vendor claim, not a measured benchmark I could verify.
$18K/year at 50 seats is clean, but the Enterprise jump for larger teams has no published ceiling.
Teams under 50 seats who want predictable monthly billing without SSO requirements.
Avoid if you need SAML SSO now and want the price before you call sales.
A knowledge assistant bolted to an LMS — grounding quality matters more than either feature list.
“Sana's pitch of search plus workflows plus corporate learning in one tool is appealing on a slide. Whether the citations hold up during a real literature-style query is the actual test, and nothing I could find answers that.”
The 1,000-documents-per-integration cap on Free and 10,000 on the $30/seat Team tier tells me something concrete about scale: this isn't built for someone sitting on a sprawling internal wiki or years of research notes. That's a real constraint for anyone doing systematic review-style work across a large corpus.
No docs page, no changelog, no API reference that I could find. For a tool that claims to ground answers in internal content, I want to see how citations are surfaced and whether source attribution is inspectable — Glean at least markets around enterprise search precision. Sana's homepage talks about 'superintelligence for work,' not retrieval methodology.
The Sana Learn bundling (LMS, LXP, authoring, virtual classroom) is a different product wearing the same badge, which makes we wonder how much engineering attention the knowledge-search side actually gets versus the training side. Contact-sales pricing for Enterprise, plus the Workday acquisition, suggests roadmap priorities may shift.
Unlimited queries on Team ($30/mo) is promising, but no evidence shows how it behaves on messy, real internal document sets.
No public docs, API reference, or changelog that I could find — hard to assess citation transparency or query behavior.
Document caps (1,000 free, 10,000 Team) mean re-checking limits regularly if working with large corpora.
Model selection (OpenAI, Claude) and MCP client for custom integrations on Enterprise suggest some depth, but discoverability is unproven.
Integrations with Confluence, Notion, Drive, SharePoint cover common research repositories, a genuine plus for literature and notes retrieval.
Teams wanting a single AI layer over moderate-sized internal knowledge bases plus training content.
Avoid if you need transparent citation tracing over a large, growing research archive.
Two products duct-taped together, priced like you'll never notice.
“Sana wants to be your search layer and your training platform at once. That's a lot of promises for one login, and the pricing page can't even tell you what it costs.”
Sana bundles enterprise search, workflow automation, and a full LMS/LXP/authoring/virtual classroom stack into one thing. That's an ambitious sell. The Team plan is $30/user/month with unlimited queries and integrations like Asana, Gmail, Zendesk. Free tier caps you at 10 meetings a month, which feels like a trial dressed as a plan, not something you'd actually run a team on for three months.
Getting Workday-acquired mid-product is a real signal. Good for stability, murky for roadmap — does Sana Learn stay its own thing or get folded into HR suite logic nobody asked for? Competing against Glean on search and Docebo, Cornerstone, 360Learning on learning means it's spread across two very different buyer conversations, and juggling both well is hard.
Enterprise pricing is "contact sales," always a small tax on your patience. Features like AI course conversion from PDFs and SCORM import are genuinely useful day one. Whether it feels this tidy by month three, once you're managing both knowledge search and training content in one tool, is the open part.
Feature list is dense and enterprise-flavored but no evidence of the small UX details that separate demo from daily use.
AI course converter and skill tagging suggest real effort to lower the authoring learning curve, per the feature list.
Platforms are web only, no mobile app mentioned anywhere I could find.
Free plan exists but caps at 10 meetings/month and 5 members, feels more like a taste than real onboarding.
No public changelog or docs listed, so no visibility into how errors or downtime get handled.
Mid-size to large orgs wanting to consolidate knowledge search and corporate training under one vendor.
You need a mobile-first tool or want transparent pricing without a sales call.
"Superintelligence for work" got acquired by Workday mid-pitch.
“Sana got folded into Workday, and the homepage still reads like an independent startup. That gap between story and reality is the whole review.”
"Superintelligence for work" is the kind of headline that ages poorly. No docs, no changelog, no API page visible — just a pricing page and a pitch. That's thin for a platform asking $30 per user/month plus a full enterprise tier.
The acquisition matters more than the feature list. Workday bought Sana; Sana Learn stays separate. That's the Drift/Salesloft pattern — good product, unclear roadmap once a bigger org owns the priorities. Docebo and Cornerstone survived a decade as standalone LMS vendors. Sana's now a division.
Feature spread is real: SCORM import, HRIS integrations, SSO/SCIM on Enterprise. Bundling LMS+LXP+authoring+workflow AI against Glean and 360Learning is ambitious, maybe overextended. Exit portability is fine on content (SCORM exports), murkier on workflows and connected data. Free plan caps at 5 members — a trial, not a commitment test.
Bundles Glean-style search with Docebo/360Learning-style LMS — broad, but no single standout moat named on the site.
SCORM import/export helps on Learn side, but workflow automation and integrations lock-in is undocumented.
Workday acquisition brings capital and stability signals but also roadmap uncertainty for the standalone product.
"Superintelligence for work" is aspirational; feature list underneath is concrete but the tagline oversells.
Consolidation-platform pitch resembles both survivors (Notion) and failed all-in-ones; too early to tell post-acquisition.
Mid-market teams wanting search, automation, and training bundled under one enterprise contract.
Avoid if you need a clear standalone roadmap independent of Workday's priorities.
Common questions answered by our AI research team
Sana's Team plan costs $30 per user/month and includes unlimited queries and meeting recordings, up to 50 members per workspace, integrations with Asana, Gmail, Outlook email, Zendesk and more, OpenAI and Claude model selection, 10,000 documents per integration, and priority email and chat support.
The Free plan gives you 10 meetings per month, up to 5 members per workspace, unlimited assistants and prompt templates, meeting integrations with Calendar, Drive, Meet, Teams, and Zoom, data integrations with Confluence, Google Drive, OneDrive, Notion, and Sharepoint, 1,000 documents per integration, and help center support.
Yes. The Enterprise plan includes domain verification, SAML-based SSO, and SCIM.
Sana integrates with Asana, Gmail, Outlook email, Zendesk, Confluence, Google Drive, OneDrive, Notion, Sharepoint, and meeting tools like Calendar, Drive, Meet, Teams, and Zoom. Enterprise plans add further enterprise integrations and an MCP client for building custom integrations.
Sana Learn combines an LMS, LXP, authoring tool, and virtual classroom into one AI-native learning platform for creating training content 10x faster, delivering AI-powered tutoring, automating admin tasks, and analyzing learning data with granular insights.
